Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

mr_cj_jr asked in SportsFootball (American) · 1 decade ago

Packers fans - How long was Aaron Rodgers supposed to sit on the bench?

I mean really.

GB drafted Rodgers in the 1st round to be the QB of the future. He sat behind Favre for 3 seasons making #1 pick money. Eventually, for salary reasons, Rodgers had to either play or be released. The Packers chose to cut ties with Favre in favor of Rodgers.

So, Packers fans, was GB supposed to keep Favre and let Rodgers continue holding the clipboard forever?

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Actually, last year Rodgers had the ability to opt out of his original contract by the end of the season, and that appeared to be what was going to happen if the Packers had kept Favre. So the Packers were basically stuck in a bad situation. They could keep Favre and possibly lose both Favre and Rodgers at the end of the 2008 season and be stuck with no one, or they could trade Favre and keep the player they thought was the future on the roster.

    So I mean really, what do you do? Because if they kept both, their was no scenerio in which they were going to be able to keep both beyond 2008.

  • 1 decade ago

    I agree, its Favre's own fault for being indecisive, he said he was going to permanently retire 2 years ago, and the Packers were going to move on to Rodgers. Then Favre being the media hog that he is wants to come back not realizing the Packers have decided to develop under their new QB. Taking Favre would have been unfair for Rodgers who had been waiting in the wings for 3 years. If Favre never started the retirement nonsense, then by all means he should be the starter, but he just can't deny Rodgers of his opportunity by thinking he'll get special treatment, I commend Ted Thompson on staying firm

  • 1 decade ago

    Most fans are not aware that Rodgers had a trade clause in his old contract. Rumor was Rodgers would have demanded a trade if TT kissed Favre's butt for 1 or 2 more seasons. I as every other Packer fan should be happy with TT's decision, cause the Packers would inevitably suck for the next decade if it wasn't for Ted Thompson.

  • Adam D
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    He made first round money, not #1 pick money... that went to Alex Smith who should have sat his first 3 seasons as well.

    He was only supposed to sit 1-2 years. Favre was already going downhill, but they didn't need a replacement QB that quick. Aaron Rodgers fell into their laps, cuz the Niners thought he had "character issues." Those character issues, were that they thought he was going to ask for too much money, and they won't pay people what they are worth. If it's not close to fair value or in their favor, then they say "see ya", and that mentality has ruined the franchise.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Big E
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    They should have left Rodgers on the bench until Favre was officially done!!! Favre's last year they were 13-3 & a few plays away from the Superbowl. Takeout Favre, insert Aaron Rodgers same team & they go 6-10 & remember 2 of those victories were over the Lions!!! If Favre is there last year they are probably 10-6 & in playoff contention. This year they will be about the same 6-10, Rodgers is ok but he's not Favre & their WR's are average because they have an average QB throwning to them & their running game was average when Favre was their but his presence gave them more opportuinites to not have 8 in the box. Last years run game below average.

    If Green Bay wanted to win then Rodgers should have sat on the bench until Favre was DONE!!!!!

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    They would have kept Favre, but Favre retired. When he cried like a baby and wanted to come back, he didn't realized that the Packer organization moved on. Thompson made a great decision. I will always have great memories of Favre, but now he is the enemy.

    I also think Rodgers is currently better than Favre. Stats proved that last year.

    GO PACK GO!

  • 1 decade ago

    Uh...It was understood that Rodgers was the heir apparent...Not sure what your point is...

    But, obviously up until he left GB, they thought Favre gave the Packers the best chance to win...not to mention obviously (at least until yesterday...*L*), Favre was the fan favorite in GB...

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    His whole career! He's terrible, the entire orginazation is terrible without Farve. They could have won the super bowl in 2008 but the retarded Ted Thompson said go away. He only went through the process of becoming a New York Jet to become a free player and now this year he's going to get back at the Packers! Fun to watch, I hope he blows them up and makes them cry and wish he was a Packer. He will retire once Ted Thompson gets either fired or humiliated. I'll be rooting for Farve against the Pack this year!

    Source(s): Life-long Packers fan.
  • 1 decade ago

    BigE who lost the NFC cahmpionship for the pack in 2007? You sir do not belong here with your opinions.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.