Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
about police offense/incident report. states detailed description of offense.How detailed does report have to?
offense description poss cs pg 1<1g location of offense blah blaa street. detailed description of offense: notified of provisions of texas crime victim act: while i was traveling WB at the listed location SV backed out of a private parking lot across four lanes of traffic. several vehicle swerved to to avoid striking SV. i stopped SV at street name and street name. i identified AP as te driver and could smell intoxicants coming from SV.AP admitted he had been drinking and i asked him to step out of SV. He kept putting in his hands in his pockets and grabbing at his waist. AP turned away from me and i immediately got out of my vehicle where i was checking AP for warrants. i seearched AP for my safety and did not find any contraband. after determining that AP was intoxicated i handcuffed AP and read him miranda rights. isearched AP and placed him in my car. AP was transported to magistrate . as AP lifted his pant legs two baggies of cocaine fell out of his pants . is this report detailed enought? weather: cool and wet. what about traffic? no mention. breatherlizer test was .06 . under legal limit .08. i only backed out to center turn lane . police did not question my passenger who was intoxicated . im sure i passed field sobriety test.but was arrested and my vehicle ignition keys were left with intoxicated friend.what if friend would have driven away and caused fatal accident? police stopped on wb lane without lights on . not until i left center lane did he follow and turn lights on. can i have evidense suppressed .stop not legit. then seach not legit.
to citicop. i asked about my drunk passenger who was not questioned or id. and was let go with my truck instead of calling inpound. and cop has to prove with video that i crossed four lanes.PROVE IT.i will not plea bargin.end plea bargin and put back responsibility into every level of our system: police could do better investigating, prosecutors and lawyers can prepare their cases better,lazy judges compelled to spend more time in court and control their calendars more efficiently. INSTRUCT THAT citicop.
2 Answers
- CiticopLv 71 decade agoFavorite Answer
That is the biggest mess I have ever read, and that is saying something on this site.
Yes, there is enough detail there. The police report is NOT evidence. It is only there to refresh the officer's memory of the events so he can testify. The officer's TESTIMONY is evidence.
There was PC to stop. There was PC to arrest. The search will probably stand.
And most drunks I arrest are "sure they passed the field sobriety tests" when this is clearly not true. You don't know what we look for on the tests, so you can have no idea how you did.
Source(s): 9+ years Law Enforcement, DWI Instructor - watleyLv 44 years ago
Technically, not something you mentioned concerns different than that there are beside the point photos of a minor on the telephone. this is not correct who is going to yell at whom, who is going to conquer whom up, not something. whether that's got here upon which you knew approximately those photos and did not record it, you additionally are accountable of against the regulation. Any bare photos of minors may be considered new child pornography. It varies via state - in Virginia, a vital became got here upon not accountable of having new child pornography because of the fact whether the girl became bare, it became not a sexual image. In different states, whether the minor is clothed, whether that's a lewd image, this is new child pornography. look up "sexting" on Google. this is an extremely heat subject remember in basic terms as we communicate and everyone caught with beside the point photos of minors would be prosecuted. it incredibly is not a "oh this is okay she gave them to him" undertaking - that's a "you would be held responsible too in case you do not record it" undertaking.