Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
For our economy to flourish shouldn't we go into Iran with all our troops?
Seems like wars helped us in the past and we would be killing two birds with one stone.
Seems like wars helped us in the past and we would be killing two birds with one stone.
I say let's get all our troops out of Afghanistan and Iraq and go into Iran where the conflict really is.
Certainly we can get the UK, Australia, Germany, France and Spain to help us. We could divide up Iran and probably send some Palestinians over there so they will quit complaining.
7 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
I think it may be cheaper this time to let Israel do it, no one else seems to care about the nukes, and no one else has the will-power to get it done.
- Tom MLv 61 decade ago
Not all of the population of Iran needs to be blown up or suffer in a war that still has not been proven that there are or will be bombs.
I don't think we need another repeat of Iraq. The people of Iran are starting to speak up by themselves. We and other countries should support these protests and they can fix their own problems internally.
The sanctions are slowing trade, high unemployment, and protests. The majority of the population know they are being screwed and want change, if they have a civil war then so be it. Then the population will elect a new leadership, as opposed to foreign occupation and in effect a foreign led government.
- ?Lv 44 years ago
hi David... The Iranian government is definitely playing "head" video games with Britain. Now the debate is "Did Britain go over into the Iranain waters?" Tony Blair states "NO" yet then we've the non negotiable Iran that states"sure". in accordance to a minimum of one professional, they stated on CNN that "NO" Britain did no longer go into Iranians territory yet while they did it wasn't intentional because of the reality that the territorial markers are demanding to work out interior the waters. So with this in techniques i think that the Iranian government is thoroughly incorrect conserving those 15 marines and squaddies. Now..that's a classic actuality that Iran would not launch their captors/prisoners. i'm no longer so particular what their thoughts are on the "dying penalty" if one is got here upon responsible. even although, our friends (the British) would not deserve this form of therapy regardless for my section. The Iranian government is "pushing buttons" so do talk. they have actually ignored the recent rules/rules surpassed via the UN for his or her nuclear application and this befell suitable in the previous the capture of those British squaddies. So this tells me that Iran is acheing for a combat, no count if it is with the U. S. or Britain or the two. Now we could embargo Iranians oil shipments till they decide directly to launch the warriors, this could harm them when you consider that they count on those shipments yet this could additionally set off some slippery hands and as a replace of court docket for those squaddies, they only could homicide them besides. i've got not got self belief negotiating is an decision now because of the fact the Iranians have ignored the UN and the U. S. and Britain. So with a majority of those factors in techniques, i think that there is in common terms some alternatives left to evaluate. the 1st decision I see is the prospect in utilising our "particular" troops the two from the U. S. and the British militia and deliver them to Iran to rescue those squaddies or asserting "conflict" with Iran. Which i think may be the final hotel to something. the two which way, i think we are able to lose greater adult adult males and ladies folk in our militia troops by way of Iran's demands. we are able to be fortunate if we are able to rescue a majority of those squaddies without extreme harm or dying. My techniques and prayers are with all of them, and that i essentially wish we are able to get them returned in Peace without greater conflict. Have a blessed day.
- charlesjerrellLv 71 decade ago
you know i hate a war protester whether its right or wrong our troops go where they are ordered to go, and for that they deserve all our support, then on the other hand it seems like when we are involved in a war we have no intentions of winning anymore, its a waste of money and of lives, the rich are the only ones who seem to profit in a war and members of the government, i say pull out of those country's and let them kill themselves as they have been doing sense time has began, meryle haggard has a song, america first, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6jrHPjm4qKM it says it all
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- rich kLv 61 decade ago
Going into Iran is why our economy collapsed, wars have never helped our economy, rebuilding afterward is when things better. As long as we're wasting money on a war things can only get worse.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
If you want the US to go broke, expand your war.
- ?Lv 41 decade ago
Yeah.. why don't you take your happy a** to Iran and see what you can do..
Let us know how it goes..