Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Why didn't South Africa have this level of corruption under white rule?
Now look at the article below that discusses how their corruption has resulted in their country mysteriously paying over $800 million for aircraft that other countries buy for less than $200 million. "It is believed that the price went up so that government officials could siphon off large bribes." This is post apartheid improvement? This is only one corruption item in a long and growing list.
From: http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htmurph/articles/...
The Flying Cash Machine
October 23, 2009: Yet another corruption case in South Africa. This time, members of parliament are asking why the military is suddenly paying $809 million each for eight A400M four engine transports. The price other nations are paying for the aircraft are under $200 million each. The price South Africa agreed to pay, in 2005, was about $279 million, and included training, maintenance support and some spare parts. It is believed that the price went up so that government officials could siphon off large bribes. Meanwhile, the A400M aircraft is four years behind schedule, and has not flown yet. It was originally to start deliveries to European customers this year. South Africa is supposed to begin getting its A400Ms in seven years. South Africa has already paid $400 million for its A400Ms, and more progress payments will soon be due.
Such blatant corruption is not new in South Africa, but lately the crooks have been winning. Last year, the South African parliament passed a law disbanding an elite government investigation unit nicknamed the "Scorpions." Investigations by this unit had led to dozens of corruption prosecutions of government officials. That's why the unit is being dismantled. Corruption is a major problem throughout Africa, and many nations are now setting up units like the Scorpions, after having realized that corruption was the major cause of the poverty and civil wars that afflict most Africans.
But the corrupt politicians and government officials tend to prove very resilient when confronted with the possibility of being punished.
Those that cannot use their money to bribe or litigate their way out of trouble, often seek to dismantle the anti-corruption organizations themselves. There is much popular unrest over this sort of thing. In South Africa, the ANC, which has ruled the country since the white minority agreed to democracy in the early 1990s, is breaking apart.
The anti-corruption faction is out to start a reform party that will take on the crooked politicians who dominate the government.
At least the corrupt politicians are being challenged, but so far the bad guys are still winning. Africa's future depends on achieving clean, or at least much cleaner, government. Revolutions alone won't do it, because that tends to just replace one bunch of corrupt politicians with a new crew, spouting new slogans.
The A400M has a top speed of 779 kilometers per hour, a range of 7,500 kilometers, and normally carries about 27 tons. The nearest competitor is the American C-130. The most common version is the C-130H. It has a range of 8,368 kilometers, a top speed of 601 kilometers per hour, and can carry up to 18 tons of cargo, 92 troops, or 64 paratroopers. The latest version, the C-130J, has a top speed of 644 kilometers, 40 percent more range than the C130H, and can carry 20 tons of cargo. The C-130J costs about $100 million each. The C-130 has been in service for over half a century, and is used by more than 50 countries.
8 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
I'm not going to read the whole article, it';s not really relevant anyway.
First, let me just say that corruption is not the sole purview of blacks, or whites, or anyone else. It's a problem with corrupt people of all races.
The problem in South Africa was not a change from white rule to majority black rule. The problem was a FORCED and too RAPID switch. The early governments, under Mandela, tried bravely to make the switch as painless as possible. Since then, the process has accelerated, and we have the situation that people are in power (both in government and in business) BECAUSE they are black, not because they have the necessary qualifications. This means that connections and influence are the important factor, not skill or knowledge.
The result of all this is that we have people in charge who do not know what they are doing, people who are sometimes corrupt themselves, of sometimes just incompetent and unable to identify or correct problems below them.
With luck, and some reasonable people on both sides of the issue, the problem will correct itself, but I fear that is unlikely. Any country that would elect Jacob Zuma is not likely to become open and incorruptable any time soon.
- ?Lv 61 decade ago
Your answer is quite simple, its called "Old School African Colonial Ideology" ! Please take the time to read Professor L.E. Ikenga's work and its going to give you an idea of not only what's going on in todays Africa but what's in the future for our own United States if 0bama and his minions are allowed to run amuck, trust me its not for closed minded people or the weak of mind!
Source(s): Old School African Colonial Ideology by Professor L.E. Ikenga - JeffLv 51 decade ago
South Africa under white rule was essentially Europe in Africa. You can't expect to drag a population chasing pigs to buying aircraft in a few decades. I'm not one to speculate on whether or not modernization and industrialization was proper the way it entered Africa, but it's silly to drag a culture centuries ahead of itself in a few decades and expect corruption won't be rampant.
Source(s): I'd like to add that anyone who hasn't lived in South Africa doesn't have a say on this issue. - mollyLv 71 decade ago
How do we know they weren't corrupt while apartheid was in force South Africa was persona non grata nobody knew what went on in their parliament.
I bet a few politician's got rich and pocketed a few diamonds for themselves though.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
You left out the hate crimes that are being committed on a daily basis. So much for Truth and Reconciliation.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
They had a far worse form of corruption -- keeping an entire race subservient and in chains.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Because white people tried to take them over. Dooi.
- 1 decade ago
Nothing to see here, people.
Just an average white racist ranting against the black man.