What reason do creationists and ID proponents think scientists have for disputing creationism and ID?

I don't buy into ID or creationism, but I think IDers/creationists argue the following, in decreasing levels of sophistication:

1) Consideration should be given to the possibility of a naturalistic designer, maybe ET, but certain systems in organisms are irreducibly complex, and science simply is unaware of the procedures used to detect design in biological systems.

2) Science has been hijacked by materialism, and has entirely ignored non-materialistic and non-reductionist possibilities. The bias is science is tremendous. While there is some evidence for evolution and Big bang, there is also much evidence against, and this should be made clear.

3) Scientists are atheists that dislike the idea of God, and push evolution and Big Bang for religious, ideological and political reasons. There isn't any evidence for these theories.

4) Scientists need to accept Jesus into their hearts, and let the Holy Spirit guide them. Then they'll see that evolution and Big Bang are deceptions of the devil. Scientists hate God, and they hate Jesus. But Jesus said he would be persecuted in the last days. (Insert mindless Bible verses that prove nothing).

In my life I have met many who are willfully ignorant about many things. They will do whatever it takes to just get attention or to be on the opposite side of many. Why they do it is beyond me. Look around at all the internet trolls. Why are they jerks to anonymous people that they will never meet? It gives them some hidden thrill to be a jerk.

I have met many people that will take an opposing view even if they know they are wrong and that everything proves they are wrong.

I have also met those that truly would deny God even if God Himself came down and showed them the creation event. They would just think they were losing their mind. Now this is not being scientific nor is it having an open mind.

There are some that are just pissed off at religion and are out to destroy it. I can't tell you why they deny what to me is so obvious anymore than you can tell me why some deny what you think is so obvious. To me it is like trying to describe the color blue to a man who has never seen. I just can't explain what I see and you don't.

I personally believe in God but shun all religion. I believe God did create everything since there is a uniformity and order to the universe. If there were no grand design, it would be completely chaotic. For every light there is a dark, bad there is a good, poison there is an antidote, yin, yang. If it were just a happenstance, you wouldn't see that. You would see a world out of balance and chaos would rule.

1. The Big Bang theory was also a product of a Christian.

2. The theory of Evolution was proposed by a Christian who attended church more than most Christians do (Yes, Darwin was a Christian and NO he did not refute his theory)

So your logic works against you.

"Young Earthers" only make up a small amount of Christians, Creationists, and ID'ers. Believing that a creator exists is NOT foolish at all. Why? We don't have a scientific theory that refutes it. None. Abiogenesis is a major flaw in Atheism, as many will admit. Well, the educated will. Deflecting to "It was bound to happen" is NOT evidence.

You know what I think? I think that these scientists choose not to believe in a higher authority that they have to answer to in the end. Because of this, they try to find some explanation for the universe that does not involve God, and run with the best idea they happen to come up with--in this case the big bang.

People can hardly keep track of what happened a thousand years ago, and they claim to know for sure exactly what happened an unimaginable amount of time ago.

Scientists have nothing to dispute with ID Proponents. Because Creationists have absolutely NO evidence to support their claim that their God created everything.

Christians ought greater desirable to be employed contained in the coolest information of our author ...moving into our very footwear quite than installation a laboratory to coach Himself or draw evolutionary diagrams,.He certainly pointed out with our actual concerns and problems.very few human beings care approximately considering their navel, greater approximately their very very own happiness , secure practices and destiny. If He had instructed us we've been the manufactured from threat and threat i do no longer think of that could desire to have replied our inner maximum desires , do you? Who tries to disprove evolution? extremely maximum persons might desire to settle for a shown potential for mutation interior of species ,in any different case they could develop into extinct decrease than environmental substitute. even nonetheless I and a lot of greater smart human beings alongside with maximum persons of scientists at the instant are not persuaded approximately "Genetic Evolution" that doesn't completely decrease cost universal thought or opinion. Darwin and the neo Darwinists of right this moment in simple terms have had an impossible situation with the excellent dearth of inter species evidence.with a view to project a fragment of human of experimentation onto a multi billion year canvass of their very very own invention looks an excellent step of religion of their very very own instruments. without trawling contained in the direction of the entire of your purple herrings (sic) i think of if we spent greater time examining with regard to the astounding correlation between Scriptural revelation and the direction of background you could have evidence adequate that each and every thing ,alongside with the entire cosmos is shifting inexorably in accordance to a predetermined climax. enable us to subsequently focus on the sole burning concern of the day:- no longer the " huge Bang" of the previous however the impressive " huge Bang" no longer so a good distance faraway from us. consistent with threat black or white hollow, what distinction?

Lol. It's quite clear you know nothing about ID. What pro atheist site did you get this cut & paste off of anyways, or are you putting your own ignorance on display?

I'm not a big Dawkins fan, but that which is claimed without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.

Their dishonesty.

The dishonesty of the scientist, that is.

The head always follows the heart and the heart that is sinful and opposed to God will find reasons to justify itself no matter how invalid.

They also ignore or conceal proofs against Evolution.

They like to self-importantly flatter themselves, If you are trying to sell someone a crock, you have to look respectable.

I like the way they always say "When we debate with atheists" if they came up to me I would say "get out of my face you freaking morons"