Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

What about military Chaplins?

Is it violation of the separation of church and state to have Chaplins in the military or would it be a violation of freedom of religion to send soldiers places where there are no places of worship without sending a Chaplin with them? Especially soldiers who believe they need last rites if they are mortally wounded.

Update:

cat_love - I believe the Chaplin (a minister) is a govt employee. That seems unique to me.

5 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    The chaplaincy is a centuries-old military tradition. They serve as counselors, morale officers, and religious officiates to military personnel. I don't see how the chaplaincy is in any way a First Amendment violation, especially since most installations have multiple chaplains for more than one religion.

  • 1 decade ago

    I know Ronald Reagan made training movies and Abbott and Costello sold war bonds but I'm not aware of Charlie Chaplin making any war movies.

    At least one person got it.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    There are chaplains for many faith groups. Chaplains are obligated to counsel those who are not members of their faith. A chaplain is an officer.

    Congress has a (civilian) chaplain.

    Military bases have chapels.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    The government is not saying, You must worship this way.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    no cuz you can go or not go your choice...

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.