Valid reasons to trust the Bible?

Question

Free of unscientific views. Many mistaken beliefs gained wide acceptance in ancient times. Views about the earth ranged from the idea that it was flat to the notion that tangible substances or objects held it aloft. Long before science learned about the spread and prevention of disease, physicians employed some practices that were ineffective at best, lethal at worst. But not once in its more than 1,100 chapters does the Bible endorse any unscientific views or harmful practices.
Planet Earth

Far ahead of its time, the Bible correctly stated that the earth is circular and hangs “upon nothing”

Scientifically sound statements. Some 3,500 years ago, the Bible stated that the earth is hanging “upon nothing.” (Job 26:7) In the eighth century B.C.E., Isaiah clearly referred to “the circle [or, sphere] of the earth.” (Isaiah 40:22) A spherical earth held in empty space without any visible or physical means of support—does not that description sound remarkably modern?

Written about 1500 B.C.E., the Mosaic Law (found in the first five books of the Bible) contained sound laws regarding quarantining of the sick, treatment of dead bodies, and disposal of waste.—Leviticus 13:1-5; Numbers 19:1-13; Deuteronomy 23:13, 14.

Partly as a result of turning powerful telescopes toward the heavens, scientists have concluded that the universe had a sudden “birth.” Not all scientists like the implications of this explanation. One professor noted: “A universe that began seems to demand a first cause; for who could imagine such an effect without a sufficient cause?” Yet, long before telescopes, the very first verse of the Bible plainly stated: “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.”—Genesis 1:1.

Even though it is an ancient book and touches on many subjects, the Bible contains no scientific inaccuracies. Does not such a book merit, at the very least, our consideration?^

^  For more examples of the Bible’s scientific accuracy, see pages 18-21 of the brochure A Book for All People, published by Jehovah’s Witnesses.
5. Fulfilled Prophecy

Imagine a weather forecaster who has a long record of being right—every time. If he predicted rain, would you carry an umbrella?

THE Bible is filled with predictions, or prophecies.** Its record, as documented by history, is clear. Bible prophecy is always right.

Distinguishing features. Bible prophecies are often specific and have been fulfilled down to the smallest of details. They usually involve matters of great importance and predict the opposite of what those living at the time of the writing might have been expecting.

The Bible accurately foretold that a leader named Cyrus would conquer mighty Babylon
King Cyrus and the city of Babylon being invaded

An outstanding example. Strategically built astride the Euphrates River, ancient Babylon has been called “the political, religious, and cultural centre of the ancient Orient.” About 732 B.C.E., the prophet Isaiah penned an ominous prophecy—Babylon would fall. Isaiah provided specifics: A leader named “Cyrus” would be the conqueror, the protective waters of the Euphrates would “dry up,” and the city’s gates would “not be shut.” (Isaiah 44:27–45:3) Some 200 years later, on October 5, 539 B.C.E., the prophecy was fulfilled in all its details. Greek historian Herodotus (fifth century B.C.E.) confirmed the manner of Babylon’s fall.##

A bold detail. Isaiah made a further startling prediction regarding Babylon: “She will never be inhabited.” (Isaiah 13:19, 20) To predict permanent desolation for a sprawling city occupying a strategic location was bold indeed. You would normally expect that such a city would be rebuilt if ruined. Although Babylon lingered on for a while after its conquest, Isaiah’s words eventually came true. Today the site of ancient Babylon “is flat, hot, deserted and dusty,” reports Smithsonian magazine.

It is awesome to contemplate the magnitude of Isaiah’s prophecy. What he foretold would be the equivalent of predicting the exact manner in which a modern city, such as New York or London, would be destroyed 200 years from now and then emphatically stating that it would never again be inhabited. Of course, most remarkable is the fact that Isaiah’s prophecy came true

John 3:16 · Accepted Answer

Wow there's a lot of know-it-alls on here who actually know nothing, for instance Mr Creation Crusher 3000 must be feeling very proud of him self with his magnificent answer, but to someone who has actually read the bible and has at least some very basic knowledge of the Hebrew language it really isn't magnificent at all, you see the Hebrew word translated "day" has a variety of meanings, including ‘a long time; the time covering an extraordinary event.’ (Old Testament Word Studies, Grand Rapids, Mich.; 1978, W. Wilson, p. 109) The term used allows for the thought that each "day" could have been thousands of years in length. As for the so called "scientific community" he implies that scientists are all in agreement and united when nothing can be further from the truth, in fact there are an ever increasing number of scientists who are now considering creational theory's, For example, mathematician William A. Dembski wrote that the "intelligent design" evident in "observable features of the natural world .　.　. can be adequately explained only by recourse to intelligent causes." Molecular biochemist Michael Behe sums up the evidence this way: "You can be a good Catholic and believe in Darwinism. Biochemistry has made it increasingly difficult, however, to be a thoughtful scientist and believe in it. 
Come on you clever and wise [in your own eyes] atheists do your own research before posting an answer after all you only sound clever to people as clever as yourself.  [Mathew 15: 14]

Brenda · Answer

The bible is not anyones opinion. It is God's inspired word. He would have made sure that only what he wants contained in it are there and that anything he did not want in was left out. These people were not giving an opinion, they were giving prophecy and good news. At times they were giving warning. God works through people, therefore several people actually wrote the bible, but it was not their words, the words are God's.

Jonhenry · Answer

What was your question?

If you really think the bible has no scientific errors then you have either never reads the bible or have the most appalling understanding of science.

It is really depressing to think in the 21st Century there are still people who believe that biblical prophecies have been fulfilled and that others will be.  Quoting the bible proves nothing it is circular reasoning.  You should try and understand the real history of the middle east and of how, when and why the books of the Old Testament were written before you make such ludicrous claims of authenticity.

בַר אֱנָשׁ (bar_enosh) · Answer

Yes, those are valid reasons to trust the Bible.

There are also at least 7 million other valid reasons to trust the Bible, found in the lives of people who use the Bible daily to direct their lives in ways that lead to peace, happiness, health, fulfillment, and a personal relationship with God.

Anonymous · Answer

There really shouldn't be any because the Bible is a FICTIONAL text that should be left behind. Let science answer the big questions.

Anonymous · Answer

I didn't read your whole thing but the bible is the word of God. Contact Jehovah's Witnesses and they will answer all your questions. Trust me, Jehovah's Witnesses are experts.

A is for Atheist · Answer

Puhleez!!  Here is just one clear contradiction to your claim that the earth is "hanging" as according the bible, it is also on "pillars"

He raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make them inherit the throne of glory: for the pillars of the earth are the LORD's, and he hath set the world upon them." 1 Sam 2:8

Here are just a few more "unscientific" views of biblical scripture:

The bible says that hares and coneys are unclean because they "chew the cud" but do not part the hoof. But hares and coneys are not ruminants and they do not "chew the cud." 11:5-6
Bats are birds to the biblical God. 11:13, 19
Four-legged fowls are abominations. 11:20
Be sure to watch out for those "other flying creeping things which have four feet." (I wish God wouldn't get so technical!) I guess he must mean four-legged insects. You'd think that since God made the insects, and so many of them (at least several million species), that he would know how many legs they have! 11:23
God's law for lepers: Get two birds. Kill one. Dip the live bird in the blood of the dead one. Sprinkle the blood on the leper seven times, and then let the blood-soaked bird fly off. Next find a lamb and kill it. Wipe some of its blood on the patient's right ear, thumb, and big toe. Sprinkle seven times with oil and wipe some of the oil on his right ear, thumb and big toe. Repeat. Finally kill a couple doves and offer one for a sin offering and the other for a burnt offering. 14:2-52

There are literally hundreds more.

12&quot; Dan · Answer

Reasons to not trust the bible?
It was written centuries after the events stated in and had been passed by word of mouth solely until then.
If I say apples are red, pass it on, 3 centuries later it ends up purple monkey dinosaur gods ruled space and made cheese pour from the sky.

In other words, the ending result is BS in all matters as there is no longer any basis of reality or fact.

Unlabeled · Answer

No valid reason to trust the bible as the means of going through life. Entertainment, yes.

Anonymous · Answer

No scientific inaccuracies?  Then why hasn't the scientific community accepted the creation of the earth in 6 days?  Noah's ark? Irreducible complexity?

Isn't bearing false witness a sin?

Trending News

Valid reasons to trust the Bible?

12 Answers