AthiestS,why did abiogenesis stop happening,and why did it stop?

I meant when did it stop,then why.

I will ask this in science next,but even the ones who say it exist atheist or not can not answer this question.

@ so crates;stop forming life.

@dream stuff;Were you there?how do you know these things as facts,please cite your source.There seems to be no MolecularOxygen,around today either,so how do you say conditions are different. different.What life today would eat the life out of abiogenesis,I need facts not conjecture.Molecular oxygen, O2 has been expected historically to be an abundant component of the chemical species in molecular clouds and, as such, an important coolant of the dense interstellar medium. However, a number of attempts from both ground and from space have failed to detect O2 emission.

@jpopelis;So we ate abiogenesis away?lol.Please tell me where i can see these stages of our billion year evolvement,and link the fossils of the past to man,truth is there are no inter mediate links(with fossils(as far as evolution))to modern man,your philosophy has many holes.Please facts not conjecture.Not trying to debate ,but you guys make it hard.

@mark;I have been chosen b/a by the asker of my last two evolution answers w the exception of the current(active) one even w/ many thumbs down.So that doesn't concern as in hurting my feelings,it is that they come w/ no merit,because I always back up what I say with example or physical evidence.That is why I am picked b/a by the askers alot like my last 8 b/a s were chosen by asker.My percentage would be through the roof if I just agreed w/ everyone.But I don't play that way.look for yourself.Like i said I always back up what I say.

And I have thumbs downed noone here,as I respect your answers even if i don't agree. I just love the debate.

gy a halfway decent answer from there ,but still has a big what if.Darwin, in a personal letter (not in his actual books or theory), gave us one big reason ...

---------------------

“It is often said that all the conditions for the first production of a living organism are now present, which could ever have been present. But if (and oh what a big if) we could conceive in some warm little pond with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, light, heat, electricity, etc., present, that a protein compound was chemically formed, ready to undergo still more complex changes, at the present day such matter would be instantly devoured, or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed.”

(Darwin, C., 1871, Letter to Hooker. Reproduced in Calvin, M. (1969). Chemical Evolution pp 1-8. Oxford University Press, London: as quoted in “Did minerals perform prebiotic combinatorial chemistry?”, Alan W. Schwartz, Chemistry & Biology 1996, 3:515-518).

-----------------

O.K ,This guy has B.S in biology and is a biology tutor,It still sounds like conjecture with the big what if.And it goes back to the we ate ABG away because we eat them before they have a chance to flourish?That answer seems to be setting a pattern .I asked for facts only but I will let this guy slide,because he has credence w/ his education.Thanx for playin boys and girls and xanzibar.lol.The jury is still out on this one,I'm not buying it.

Sorry here is the rest......this should be over my last post. The origin of life on Earth would have required the accumulation and complexification of organic compounds, over the course of millions, tens of millions, or hundreds of millions of years. But once life existed, it would be there to feed on accumulating organic compounds, preventing them from accumulating and complexifying.

Source(s):

BS in biology; university biology tutor

* 29 minutes ago