FALSE - New Zodiac Sign. Do you actually believe?

Question

Yes, I can explain it to you since I'm an astrologer. This is a requirement since many of you are being involved into what's known as "TWITTER SNOWBALL EFFECT". 

Here are some facts from me, an astrologer.

- Astrology is not astronomy. An astronomer can't decide about changes in Zodiac. If people did actually tried to learn about what's going on they would find that even the person who said that "astrologers are not valid anymore" never mentioned anything about actually adding a new Zodiac sign.

- Zodiac is not connected to constellations proportionally. That means that signs are divided by Earth equinox, instead the position of the stars. Aries starts exactly same each year and it's all based upon 365 days of our Earth going around the Sun. Sign of Aries starts exactly on Spring Equinox. 

- Zodiac CAN'T CHANGE the number of 12 since it's based upon Four Elements. That's why there're Fire, Air, Earth and Water signs and EACH OF THEM are divided by the number of three (similar to three aggregate states).

- It's just a rumor that started by some stupid people who don't even know how to properly read before making an elephant of a fly. Don't buy into talking of people who're not astrologers!

- Astrology is not "daily horoscopes". Daily horoscopes are not connected with astrology and they represent a global disease of stupidity involved. heck, the reason why the horoscopes section is here is because it's considered to be "fun" lol
Daily horoscopes are greatly despised by both Scientists as well as Astrologers alike. 
 
- If you have anything else to ask, feel free. The involvement and such a boom that happened yesterday is seriously irrelevant and utterly amazing to see how people are being superficial about it. There's no change nor there ever will be change. 

- Also, sideral a.k.a eastern house system of the Zodiac also doesn't take the sign of Ophiuchus as a concerned factor in astrology. Actually, nobody does expect some people who don't even know what decans are. So don't buy into anything before you adequately research it. That's one of my paroles :} 
Anyway, there's no new or old astrology, there's only one astrology that resembles as truthful and it's exactly the one that's tropical. I've researched other ones which never ever showed as much reinsurance as tropical house system showed. Actually, there's even no Sideral or Tropical Zodiac, those are only house systems which are different. Zodiac Isn't changeable in both Sideral and/or Tropical house systems! : )

- There's only ONE true astrology and it's what's today popularly known as Tropical Zodiac house system based astrology which originated from Mesopotamian area and it's name given by the citizens of Ancient Rome. One of the first teachers of astrology were Kalidei (Children of the Stars) who were Mesopotamian priests in that time. Name of Western Astrology is used simply because of the same media publicity and is taken as something usual (something similar to "I can has cheezeburger" or "It's over 9000").

Stick with the tropical house system and to adequately conclude your Zodiac sign I suggest program called World of Wisdom, trial version :] 

And, please, don't read newspaper horoscopes - those aren't horoscopes at all, all just media crap that's meant for mere fun.

Best regards to all those with common sense.

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

The whole zodic sign change is bulls***

Libralicious · Answer

I am absolutely infuriated by this FAKE astrological CHANGE! First of all there is no 13th Zodiac sign, Ophiuchus is a constellation! Not a personality! Second of all 13 is an unlucky number! Third of all if there were a 13th Zodiac sign or any sorta Zodiac change then that would mean everything we knew as astrology was wrong! The entire Astrological calculations and measurements would be throw off! Everything we thought we knew about ourselves would be incorrect! Not on my watch! I was born into my birth chart and nothing is changing! UGH! This whole thing has got me SO WORKED UP!

? · Answer

This is nothing new. Astronomy (a true science) observes the skies not astrologers. Planets and asteroids are discovered by astronomers, astrologers assign and reassign the attributes. It is too much work for the astrologers to adapt the shift and really be "modern" 

The current zodiac is factual if you are anything but an astrologer.

"Aquarius is a miscellaneous set of stars all at different distances from us, which have no connection with each other except that they constitute a (meaningless) pattern when seen from a certain (not particularly special) place in the galaxy (here)"

Richard Dawkins

Anonymous · Answer

Good post...... All that is left to do is for those NOOB to realize that we have 12 signs and it hasn't changed. Most astrologers use Tropical and personally, I'll stick to that unless REAL proof comes about in the next 100 hundred + years.

Aries

Anonymous · Answer

Here is some real common sense.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-12199980
Why do you think Horoscopes' are in the 'Entertainment' section of Yahoo Answers?????
In the Islamic world astrology was rejected during the turn of the 2nd millennium AD owing to the development of the scientific method. Muslim views on astrology have generally remained negative.
By the time of Francis Bacon and the scientific revolution, newly emerging scientific disciplines acquired a method of systematic empirical induction based upon experimental observations.At this point, astrology and astronomy began to diverge; astronomy became regarded as one of the empirical sciences, while astrology came to be understood as a part of scholastic metaphysics, and was increasingly viewed as an occult science or superstition by natural scientists. For example, Christiaan Huygens wrote in his Cosmotheoros: "And as for the Judicial Astrology, that pretends to foretel what is to come, it is such a ridiculous, and oftentimes mischievous Folly, that I do not think it fit to be so much as named."Studies have repeatedly failed to demonstrate statistically significant relationships between astrological predictions and operationally defined outcomes.Effect size tests of astrology based hypotheses conclude that the mean accuracy of astrological predictions is no greater than what is expected by chance.thatAstrophysicist Neil deGrasse tyson asserted that astrology was discredited 600 years ago with the birth of modern science. 'To teach it as though you are contributing to the fundamental knowledge of an informed electorate is astonishing in this, the 21st century'. Education should be about knowing how to think, 'And part of knowing how to think is knowing how the laws of nature shape the world around us. Without that knowledge, without that capacity to think, you can easily become a victim of people who seek to take advantage of you'".]

Jilly · Answer

This whole thing is getting really annoying. All these noobs are coming to this section asking the same damn question! What's so hard looking up the question instead of wasting 5 points? It would be beneficial for everyone for those newbies to stop being lazy and just look up already asked questions. I'm sick of trying to explain this to everyone. YOU'RE ALL STILL THE SAME SIGN!

Nein! · Answer

THANK U!
i didnt wanna be libra =/
scorpio just sounds so much mooorrrrrrreeee..HOT! lol 8D

Anonymous · Answer

False

♏Radek♏ · Answer

Thank you!! Finally! Everyone needs to shut the hell up and understand that nothing has ******* changed >.<

*SPARKZ* · Answer

Whoever posted thisis a complete and utter noob, and I would know because he leaves completely untrue and stupid answers. He shoud go suck a lollipop. (;

Trending News

FALSE - New Zodiac Sign. Do you actually believe?

11 Answers