Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Unkurg
Lv 5
Unkurg asked in Arts & HumanitiesBooks & Authors · 1 decade ago

Do you think books we consider to be classics would have a hard time being published today?

Right now I am reading "The Brothers Karamazov" by Fyodor Dostoyevsky. Excellent novel. Rightfully considered a classic. Yet I can't help but think that if Dostoyevsky were alive today and submitted this book the first thing a publisher would do is insist that huge passages be edited out, because the book as is would not be considered "marketable".

Then again, I could be wrong. What do you think?

5 Answers

Relevance
  • Joss
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    Yes. How books are written today has evolved. There's a lot of narrative and exposition that wouldn't be tolerated in today's book. For example, Pride and Prejudice. There's a lot of narrative and telling of what's happening. That kind of writing was perfectly fine back when Jane Austen was writing. The writing/publishing/reading climate today is much different and readers expect differently of books. So, it's not necessarily that the classics are wrong in how they were written, they were right for that point-in-time. Just like today. How we write novels today might not be acceptable 100 years from now and people will be asking this same question about books like Harry Potter or Atonement or any book that most people think is great today but might never be published if the author tried 100 years from now.

    But, then again, if Jane Austen were alive today, she'd be writing by today's standard and the book will be written differently and up to standards. So, it could very well be published today because it will be written within today's writing standards.

  • 1 decade ago

    Most definitely. It took centuries for some of those books to become a classic. They were significant to one particular era - they depict the mentality, ethics, behavior and the language of an era. It's because they bring a valuable message or because they were written with congeniality that people still can appreciate them, maybe even relate to them. And if you look at the books that get published nowadays.... Boy. There's no way any publisher would appreciate e.g. Crime and Punishment today. That's because it has practically no action what so ever. Most of the books we get today are concentrated on the plot development, less on characters. Stories are valued from a different perspective, a perception of a genius is very different today than it was one or two centuries ago...

    So yes, they would have a hard time. Thanks God they were published when they were.

  • 1 decade ago

    Oh yes, a lot of classics wouldn't be published today. My hubby just quoted some publishers/editors not too long ago about how Tolkien wouldn't stand a chance of publication these days because of his style of writing. But back in the 60's it was more acceptable to craft a story the way he did. Similarly, Shakespeare would never be published due to many reasons involving word usage, grammar, theme handling, etc. Other authors like Dickens, Jane Austen, and many of the "greats" would find it difficult to sell today because they tell their stories more so than "show" it. But again, back in that day and age, it was an acceptable and preferable way to tell a story.

    So the answer is yes. And this is mainly due to the fact that the reader demographic and their attitudes, trends, beliefs, tastes have changed drastically. We're less patient nowadays, we're pressed for time, we're just not a good audience for many authors who have written the classics. (Speaking in general terms).

  • 1 decade ago

    If a publisher nowadays thinks a book would need a lot of work to make it marketable, they generally won't offer to publish it (unless the author is already well-known). They're not short of publishable manuscripts. But your general point stands. I think just about any book written before 1950 wouldn't get published today. Movies and TV have made readers impatient. For example, we don't want long atmospheric descriptions of exotic locations - we've seen them on travel programmes, or we've been there ourselves.

    A more interesting question - and much harder to answer - is which, if any, of the writers of classic novels would be able to write something that meets the current definition of "publishable" or "marketable", were they alive today.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 5 years ago

    Why might you opt to capture an editors activity? you opt to capture the brokers activity. approximately 3% of people who try, be in a position to get printed. .5% of those earn sufficient to help them, without working a 2d interest. you elect a hook. it particularly is communicate, action or prose that captures the activity of who ever is examining it. leaf by each and all of the books you have, and look at their hooks. What do they use? Use them for proposal to get a impressive hook.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.