Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 6
? asked in Pregnancy & ParentingPregnancy · 10 years ago

Giving birth and Medical Intervention?

I want to know what other mothers and mother-to-be opinions are on medical intervention when a woman goes into labor.

Example:

A woman is in labor lets say she's about 6 hours in and at 4cm. The hospital has decided that things are not progressing fast enough for them so they give her pitocin. After having the pitocin her contractions have become much more frequent and very painful so she has a epidural. Now she numb and 10cm and is having issues pushing because she can't feel her contractions so the intervene yet again using forceps, vacuum, or even jump into a c-section. At the end of all this we all say "Thank goodness the doctors were there to intervene and save the baby..blah blah blah."

My opinion is that is the hospital never injected the women with artificial hormones a lot of this could have been avoided. Women have been giving birth for hundred of years yet now it's become a gong show and it seems like you are not able to fulfil your idea of what birth should be like. What's your opinion?

1 Answer

Relevance
  • D
    Lv 7
    10 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    There is a tremendous amount of unnecessary medical intervention in the birth process. Having rates of c-sections of 30-35% and up to 50-55% at some hospitals is proof enough of that. World Health Organization recommends that a rate of 10% is more in line with what is actually necessary or beneficial. Many countries have rates that low with very low infant and maternal morbidity and mortality.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.