Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Who ever thought it was a good idea to design...?
women's clothing with huge gaudy flowers on the front??? I'm a small woman, and this style would look hideous on me. It would only look okay on a 6-foot tall woman, and then it's only questionable... Just goes to prove my theory that f****ts design women's clothing, and want us to look as awful as we possibly can. I won't be wearing this. Does ANYONE think this design is attractive, or even acceptable?
Delish... I can't believe you haven't seen them. The flowers are not sewn on, but are within the fabric. Sorta like screenprint. They're found on tees, dresses, blouses, anything like that a woman might wear, and they look horrible! I'm five feet tall. I'm not gonna look very good with a three-foot flower plastered all over the front of me. It looks like I'm dressed up in my mother's clothing (except that she was only 4' 10")...
4 Answers
- ?Lv 610 years agoFavorite Answer
Hahahaha I'm not exactly sure what you mean by huge gaudy flowers. Like printed or actually sewed on? Anyway f's do design women's clothing and flamboyancy is their specialty so that's what you get. Same reason why haute couture runway models have no boobs. They look like men!
- 10 years ago
No, its the most ugly thing on earth. Anything foral is ugly to me. I love tees with logos on them. Therr nice, plain and simple. Or even a nice tank top from american eagle thats bare
- ?Lv 46 years ago
Yah i mean if clothings over cumbersome then its not practical. Thanks for raising this point to the world