Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Managerial economics or Financial Economics? What should I do my bachelors in?
I'm torn between these two and can't decide. Please tell me, in brief, the pros and cons of each.
Any advice would be much appreciated.
Please and thank you!
2 Answers
- Anonymous10 years agoFavorite Answer
I would suggest doing financial economics and taking some management courses, not management economics. It would be a good blend between achieving some understanding of financial instruments and related theories and how to manage aspects of an organization, things that relate psychology to how people behave in organizations.
You would be able to study some managerial economics on your own as your wish. In my view managerial economics is somewhat less practical only because I think businesses communicate more in the realm of what business analysts do, not necessarily in the specialized way the managerial economists approach. Not that it won't give you insights, but management courses and the theories they teach are something that you will be able to use with less specialized people.
- ?Lv 44 years ago
My brother, with none journey, all have been given to artwork in a machinist save at 18 he made ~18$ an hour. indoors the path of approximately 6 months he reworked 22 thousand funds(after taxes). He then prepared to offer up because of actuality he did no longer decide to evoke indoors the morning and bypass to artwork. If my lazy brother could make solid funds as a sweeper at a machinist save, i think of a smart worker with 10 years journey could make plenty extra effective effectual funds. So i truthfully have faith the right article.