What specific non-Evangelical beliefs would cause one to be labeled a Neo-Evangelical?

When you start reasoning for yourself rather than just accepting

all the myths that have been presented to you;

when you start to question some of the stories you have

heard for years, you are in danger of losing your evangelical fervor.

I don't think it's a question of undermining "the" Evangelical message; rather, it's a case of challenging the notion that one cannot be evangelical without subscribing to a rather calcified set of positions. The problem isn't departure from evangelism, but rather the tendency of certain subgroups to add extra requirements--basically, to demand support for all their views--as a prerequisite for their recognition.

Perhaps this site illustrates the point:

http://www.rapidnet.com/~jbeard/bdm/Psychology/neo...

It's a listing that pretty much insists the label "Evangelical" is owned by fundamentalism. It isn't.

http://themoorings.org/doctrine/issues/neo-evangel...