Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Are there any Jehovah's Witnesses from Australia here...?
...who attended the court hearing involving the criminal prosecution of the "faithful and discreet slave" in Victoria on October 11th?
If so, can I get your opinion on the statement made by Rachel van Witsen of Vincent Toole Solicitors (the Watchtower Society's in-house law firm located inside Bethel, Australia) to the effect that --
The faithful and discreet slave is not a legal entity, does not exist as a person, does not exist as an unincorporated body, and does not exist as a body of Christians and therefore should be struck from the charge list?
What about the statement on rebuttal that the "faithful and discreet slave" does not exist, but is merely a "theological arrangement?"
What about the Watchtower attorneys' statement that the "Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses" neither exists nor operates within Victoria and Australia?
I am very interested in the opinions of any Jehovah's Witnesses who were present or who are aware of this. Is this just a case of legal maneuvering, or is it true that "the faithful and discreet slave" that Jehovah's Witnesses worldwide have been so dedicated to for over a hundred years does not exist anywhere outside of Watchtower publications?
And how do you feel about the Magistrate's recommendation that criminal charges be brought against each and every member of the Governing Body?
My question will be crystal clear to those to whom it is directed, thank you.
I have very few people blocked. The ones I do have either a) sent me nasty emails; b) openly stated in their answers that they report questions; or c) are suspected multiple accounts of one member who uses his extra accounts to report and have questions deleted. Since I blocked the suspected multiple accounts, the number of reports against my Q&A's dropped drastically. Thank you for the heads-up that "John" is probably another of his multiple accounts.
This link is to a news article from earlier this year concerning the case I'm referring to: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/more-news/former-...
This is probably not widely known among any JW's not living in the area of Victoria. I have a friend who lives nearby.
Wow, I had to go out for a few hours and this Q goes haywire! I very much appreciate the good information that has been shared, and the defenses as well. ♥ The purpose of this Q is not to cause strife, but to gain honest information and opinions from JW's who were either present in the courtroom or who have first-hand information from those who were. I love you all--let's play nice, folks!
BTW, Rutherford was found guilty of violating the Espionage Act based on printed materials. He was far from alone--many, many people were prosecuted and jailed at this time of U.S. history, close to the time of the "Red Scare."
And he certainly was NOT "exonerated on all charges!" He filed a Petition for a Writ of Error, and apparently one or more errors were committed during the course of the trial either on the part of the prosecuting attorney or the trial court judge which resulted in the case being remanded to the US Attorney's office for review. It was likely so
mething as simple as an improper charge to the jury (I was a paralegal before coming home to raise my children, and improper jury instruction was the #1 cause of reversible error in cases I dealt with). By the time the case came to the Office of the US Attorney for review, the Paris Peace Conference had already convened (in January) and the Treaty of Versailles was on the table. With everything cooled down, "sedition" was not such a big deal anymore, and the decision was made to drop the case (as was the decision on many other such Espionage Act cases that were remanded at the time for reversible error). When a case is dropped like this, it is not an admission that the defendant is not guilty, nor is it an exoneration. It's more like the case is not worth the time, trouble, or taxpayers' money to go through a retrial. In other words, Rutherford was released in March of 1919 on technicalities involving courtroom procedure.
19 Answers
- Big Guy 360Lv 69 years agoFavorite Answer
This is a preliminary summary only. I hope to obtain more details later.
All five cases are still within the criminal justice system. The Crown (the Office of Public Prosecutions) was also present in court via video link and contributed to the proceedings. Several members from the Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses attended the hearing as observers, no doubt out of curiosity.
Legal Counsel for Jehovah's Witnesses, Sister Rachel van Witsen, an employee of Vincent Toole Solicitors, presented arguments on behalf of the following "accused":
Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of Australia
Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania, Inc.
Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses
Faithful and Discreet Slave
A number of the legal arguments presented by the Watch Tower Society shocked the members of the Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses who were observing. This included that there is no Christian Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses operating in the State of Victoria or in Australia.
Also the true legal and religious identity of the "faithful and discreet slave" was revealed. (More on this development later)
In relation to the Governing Body of Jehovah's Witnesses, the Magistrate made recommendation that consideration be given to having each individual member of the Governing Body criminally charged. He was NOT IMPRESSED that the religion of Jehovah's Witnesses had been refusing to comply with the Working with Children Act since July 2008. He asked for an explanation as to why they refused to comply but none was offered by their legal counsel other than "it has all been sorted out."
An application was made by the Crown (the Director of Public Prosecutions) for an adjournment of the case for four weeks so that they can complete the gathering of evidence in conjunction with Victoria Police.
The next court hearing date is scheduled for November 8, 2011.
I am hoping that more information from our XJW in Australia, who commented on the last court hearing, will be forthcoming asap.
Read this link also; http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/child-a...
Edit-
Why is everybody beating up on peacelilliy, she didn't do this, she didn't bring these charges against anyone. This is in a court of Law and it has not all been played out. Everybody will have their day in court. Everybody getting all upset and name calling is just uncalled for. Let the court argue the points out. Don't shoot the Messenger if you don't like the message.
Edit-----------------------------------
You Jw's need to understand your words you use to denigrate or belittle us like opposers, apostates of from Christendom, when these words come from a JW we put that on as a badge of righteous. Your true colors have really shown here. No matter how you try and spin this information, it is what it is. You can't just bury your heads in the sand and beat up on everyone. That just makes you guys look even worse. Mindy you really do need to take that stick off your shoulder, it really is unbecoming. Although it looks as if you picked up a secret admirer, I don't know if that is a good thing or a bad thing. See how that plays out! Give him the wink wink!
Edit----
Seth Kagen, yes I very well ment you! You know you don't even know me, but I am quite sure that if you met me face to face, you would call me "SIR" that I am positive about. I have no ideal why you are on this site with your attitude, you must have your own religion or something?
- DivinePathLv 79 years ago
I just read (via one of the links on here, while browsing though the online discussion at that link) that everything has been posponed to January 21, 2012.
Because no one showed up at the last scheduled hearing.
I am not a JW, however, I have read their books, and go to their web sites, but have yet to visit the Kindom Hall here.
I would love it if someone could show me any data in regard to this via a JW web site or even a CNN report or a local and recent online newspaper.
And as far as the Faithful and Dscreet Slave being said to not exist...well, I doubt this would be as devastating as some would like to make it.
The attorney said it was a "theological arraingment"... ah, yeah, it is, technically.
If this story is even true, it won't even matter..
Peronaly, I am more concerned why they didn't comply with the authorities..in making sure the kids were safe, by following the rules set down.
Also am curious about this "Christian Association of Jehovah's Witnesses" Huh? Guess they had to registar as Christian..
But they are not Christians, even watchtower.org will show u this. They don't hide this.Correction... if you go there, read the article "are jehovas witnesses protestant?" this is what I meant.. ifthey are not protestant, and not catholic, how are they Christian? Not in any traditional sense, for sure. I'm not even knockin that, I'm just saying.
So, I was surprised to see this as a body that is up for being sued.
And since the charged stem to the FDS, they had to give the answer Unthinks said, because if they didn't, I bet that they woud then be able to sue ever Kindom Hall and every member in them.And that's insane.
If anyone has any up to date stuff... please add..
- DorothyLv 45 years ago
According to I know (some of my spiritual brothers now in Australia) they have to face the same troubles, for making a life, for preaching good news, for being good parents and sons, etc. The bad influences are the same here and there, and not just JW parents have to deal with. Fornication, adultery, homosexuality, luxury, etc., all sin is the same wherever, and the Bible standars are the same wherever, and Jehovah's Witnesses do apply in their lives wherever. Greetings.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- isnrblogdotcalmLv 59 years ago
As an ex JW (I was one for 50 years) and I was a Pioneer and Elder I am an Apostate and fiercely proud of that fact.
I have read some on this case. It seems to me to be more smoke and mirrors Watchtower BS. The Faithful and Discrete Slave does not exist??
It will be interesting to se how the Jo Ho's wiggle out of this one.
It reminds me of the case in the 1980's when the entire JW Congregation in Bonham, Texas seceded from the Witnesses and in doing so claimed the Kingdom Hall as their property. The interesting thing is that in this case the Watchtower Society claimed the hall on the basis that they were a hierarchical organization.
Funny, but up until that time the Watchtower Society had continue to claim that they had no clergy distinction, and thus no hierarchy. The Society had always took the position that they were a "congregational" organization and not a hierarchical organization.
What happened in Bonham, Texas when the body of elders and the majority of the congregation decided to leave the Watch Tower organization? For the first time in its history the Watch Tower Society made two important arguments:
First, they were now a Hierarchical like the Catholic Church, with the Governing Body, Branches Overseers, District Overseers, Circuit Overseers, and Elders appointed by the Society.
Second, The Society as a hierarchy, therefore, had the rightful title to the Kingdom Hall. This was a serious departure from all their previous claims, and is among the many issues that impressed upon me that the Society was no longer what it claimed to be.
The result? The Society lost because the Bonham congregation was able to prove that the Society was a historically a ‘congregational’ organization, and as such had no legal title or interest recorded on the deed. The Society was unable to establish legal interest.
So, another legal weasel maneuver by the masters of making "the truth" whatever serves their purpose.
EDIT SUZY: I asked a Witness recently "What if God or an Angel appeared to you and told you that the Catholic religion was the correct one and to please Jehovah you should be a Catholic?"
His answer: "I'm sticking with the Brothers in Brooklyn"
More like both of you have your heads stuck in the sand. Hows that working for ya'?
So did Armageddon come before the end of the 20th Century? The Faithful Slave said it would:
From: The Nations Shall Know That I Am Jehovah - How? 1971 p. 216”
”Shortly, within our twentieth century, the “battle in the day of Jehovah” will begin”.
EDIT SETH KAGEN: Are you really studying eith the JW's? You claim to be objective and it would do you good to be very objective as regards the Witnesses.
I was raised a Witness, so it took me a while to become objective. If you can square yourself with all the false prophesies join up and go knock on doors. You can have my slot.
- Anonymous9 years ago
The WTS will stall and stay away as long as they are able. Here is the Dec-6th 2011 latest;
They are squirming as never before at Bethel.
This sect will litigate until they run out of processors. This sect is a legalistic power-house of attorneys, trained in the subtle defense methods of the best political minds around.
They could tie this type of International court litigation up for years, while they make their plans for a split, or dissolution.
This is a serpent we are talking about, not a religion.
Their sunset is rapidly approaching.
Oh, and Mindy, you are not a Christian....yet. capeesh?
Mindy says; "
# 2) Jehovah is about to gain yet more glory to His name by this event (You may not realize it, but our God specializes in making the impossible possible as well as causing what SEEMS to be bad for His people by His people into a blessing."
Mindy, since when did Jehovah say a false prophet will live?
And "Teller of truths". I am sorry you are a Jehovah's Witness also....oh, did I put the "comma" in the wrong place?
I KNOW there will be a day when the present members will succumb to the truth of the WTBTS, and we will NOT make you feel poorly, I promise that. We will welcome you, but first you must come to your senses, with HUMILITY.
This is the simple law that God Almighty has told Jehovah's Witnesses to obey, as through the "Authorities";
"The Parliament of Victoria have stated that the main purpose of the Working with Children laws “is to assist in protecting children from sexual or physical harm by ensuring that people who work with, or care for, them have their suitability to do so checked by a government body.”
Jehovah's Witnesses have disobeyed God, by snubbing their noses at the government.
Ex-members of this group can thank Jesus for allowing them to escape the plagues that are preparing to cascade onto this stiff-necked people.
Source(s): 40 years in slavery to the WTS, free now in Jesus Christ. - Anonymous9 years ago
JW's customarily go into denial when anything is exposed to the light.
They try to bury the widespread paedophilia cases among their group,
and all this talk of Rutherford's exoneration appear to be nothing more
than wishful "talk".
A "teaching elder" who used to come to my door peddling JW dogma
came back to see me a couple of years later, to let me know he was
now a born again, saved Christian. I could see his countenance before
he even said a word - like a load had lifted from his shoulders, but even
better was the fact that 24 other members had come out with him and
stepped into the light.
Perhaps the outcome of this current case my help release more. It's a
tragedy that so many are led to believe Jesus and His apostles didn't
know the correct doctrine when His church was established, back in
the first century... as if the world had to wait for Charles Russell !! LOL
God (Jehovah) was manifested in the flesh (1 Timothy 3:16) and came
to us incarnate in Jesus Christ. (2 Corinthians 5:19 / Colossians 2:9)
He made that plan clear enough in the books of the Old Testament:~
(2 Samuel 7:12-17 / Psalm 2:7 / Isaiah 7:14 / Isaiah 9:6 / Isaiah 52:6)
Jesus verified it:~
(John 8:24 / John 8:58 / John 10:30 / John 12:44-45 / John 14:6-10)
. . . and Jesus said: "you shall be witnesses to me.." (Acts 1:8)
- ?Lv 59 years ago
Interesting. So the next time a Jehovah's Witness starts going on about the faithful and discreet slave and submitting to direction, I can point out the faithful and discreet slave does not exist!
I too have few people blocked. Would you mind telling me who the "serial reporters" are maybe if I block these individuals the "reporting" will end.
- Anonymous9 years ago
Poor Mindy! Sounds like she is brainwashed. Jehovah Witnesses contradict their own bible. It is obvious.
The Jehovah's Witnesses assert that Jerusalem was destroyed by the Babylonians in 607 BC. This date is critical to their selection of 1914 for the arrival of Christ in kingly power and 1918 as the year when Jesus entrusted the anointed members of the faithful and discreet slave class to care for all his Kingdom interests here on earth. Without the 607 date, this whole chronological structure collapses together with the claim that Jehovah's Witnesses are God's sole representative on earth today.
Carl Olof Jonsson crushes the 607 date completely by force of historical, irrefutable physical evidence and arrives at the one true conclusion: The Watch Tower Society is in error about the 607 date and by claiming divine selection turns out to be guilty of false prophecy.
2 Cor 11:13-15 "God's messengers?" They are counterfeits of the real thing, dishonest practitioners masquerading as the messengers of Christ. Nor do their tactics surprise me when I consider how Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. It is only to be expected that his agents shall have the appearance of ministers of righteousness, but they will get what they deserve in the end.
- conundrumLv 79 years ago
Let me understand this: the person bringing this lawsuit is concerned that the adult men could be having sex with the children while driving or pulling over to the curb and so on & so forth- what the heck is going on in Australia? We are honestly talking about SWD..Sex while driving? ... now that is one sick puppy!
- danmanLv 69 years ago
Half the jw responding know nothing about the case, the other half wish to keep their heads buried deeply in the sand. Perhaps if they do not see it, it will go away.
My my the pure hatred exuding from the replies, toward a long time participant on YA, who has over and over again showed her christian personality by not reviling or paying back in kind.
Reality check! This case is a current event. It is in the news. So jw think that such new events are to be ignored, no one is allowed to seek information as to the status of the case? Just how does that fit into being promoters of the 'truth'. HIde any truth that may have a negative impact on the cult? Yeah that is exactly what cult members try and do. Right or wrong our beliefs are above questioning and no one is allowed access to our inner workings. So typical of mind numbed robots in fear of the light of real truth.
Your responses to peacelilly continue to show Jehovah's Witnesses have no idea what Jesus description of the personalities of his followers would be.
Mathew 5:
14 “YOU are the light of the world. A city cannot be hid when situated upon a mountain. 15 People light a lamp and set it, not under the measuring basket, but upon the lampstand, and it shines upon all those in the house. 16 Likewise let YOUR light shine before men, that they may see YOUR fine works and give glory to YOUR Father who is in the heavens.
If you stand on the world stage and point to yourselves as the 'light of the world' then you better be prepared to prove it by your fine works. You jw here on YA fail miserably at showing a bright shine of light, instead you call down evil and speak degrading of anyone who does not see your dim light of so-called good works of going from door to door. It means nothing when your personalities display such hatred and ill will toward those not convinced you have anything even close to 'the truth'.
@ btw the cutesy, wink, wink, sarcastic comments that some brand new jw employ to vent their own pent up anger toward anyone who does not agree, gets old really fast. Seems like it would be a real blessing for a mature fellow witness to pull that rookie jw aside and help them see just how unattractive that sort of display really is. You cannot put a pretty face on such dark and negative musings. Ciao.
@Here is the quote from The Nations Shall Know book published in 1971:
JEHOVAH'S "SWORD" AGAINST
"ALL THOSE OF FLESH"
Shortly, within our twentieth century, the "battle
in the day of Jehovah" will begin
against the modern
antitype of Jerusalem, Christendom. The ancient "soil
of Israel" pictures the realm in which Christendom has
operated. It pictures the standing and relationship that
Christendom has claimed to occupy with God by means
of his "new covenant" of which Jesus Christ is the
mediator................................
................................................................
However, Jehovah's "sword" will not be applied
merely to those adhering to Christendom. It will also
be brandished against "all flesh from south [Christendom]
to north."
Tell me that the above is not a direct prediction made under the auspicious of being God's prophet class as claimed here in the 1972 Watchtower: