What exactly is the "liberal agenda"?

There isn't one. Every time you hear a right-winger use a broad stereotype, especially if it includes the word "agenda," your radar should start beeping. Think about it: can you really believe that every liberal in the country wants the exact same things or has the exact same priorities? What about gay people? Do they have a "gay agenda"?

These are just red herrings and straw men that wackos use to keep others riled up and scared.

People don't even agree on who is "liberal" because of how the word is used in conflicting ways. When people talk about the "liberal agenda" with a stereotype, I think they're typically talking about authoritarian stuff, and not the "small-L" liberal which is about the individual. When people argue against the idea of a "liberal agenda", they typically bring in the "small-L" liberals as a counter argument, even though they're polar opposites. People that actually discuss them as two separate groups will refer to one as capitalized and one as not capitalized, but not enough people really do that.

We enable theatrical people in basic terms via alluring them. The ego feeds on interest. What you're describing does not sound like permitting, while you at the instant are not alluring them immediately. that's style of like alluring a newborn who's throwing a tantrum. Any reaction in any respect, helpful or damaging, reinforces the concept that the tantrum gets them interest. (that's a unfastened analogy—there are different varieties of tantrums.) i don't think protecting Christian ideals which at the instant are not fundamentalist extremes helps fundamentalists. yet as quickly as we work together their discussions (every person, not in basic terms reasonable or liberal Christians), as quickly as we renowned their extremism in any respect, it fuels the ego and reinforces the habit, to that end encouraging much greater severe habit. Christian fundamentalists use rational discussions with them or perhaps assaults against them as justification for their strikes. think of how they might react if no person paid any interest to them in any respect? they had could circulate to even better extremes to get interest. the problem is one among ego, not concept.

Power and control over all the people.

No idea shows that more the Green Agenda.

Control every part of every ones life.

Take a look at Wisconsin right now.

Liberals want to control the government to insure lots and lots of government jobs.

And who is it again that pays the wages of government workers?

According to the people who WROTE the policy set all elected Democrats pursue, it's to eliminate the American Constitutional rule of law and replace it with a fascist oligarchy who literally OWNS the general population.

Back in the 30s, they openly and proudly said this was the goal. That sort of "enlightenment" was widely held to be cool at the time. Once "Hitler" became a dirty-word here those people started calling themselves "liberals" and today literally 100% of elected Democrats follow their model to the letter.

To make the US a welfare state and control us from cradle to grave.

sorta like robin hood taking from the rich but liberals want to take from everyone.....and give to their voters of course....

It's just what you are doing: trying to look smart and sarcastic.

idk. but so far its gotten us out of two wars and the economy is definatly better than four years ago. if obama was a republican everybody would like him.

You are looking at it