Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, Paul... or another 4 years of Obama?

In answer to your question, no the Country will not survive another four years under 0bama's lack of leadership. And I don't see Romney as the answer either. In his gruff and at time abrasive manner I believe Gingrich is the answer. Taking into consideration his previous experience and his ability to deal with both sides of the aisle would be very beneficial in solving our Counties current dilemma and setting her on track to recovery.

Ron Paul 2012 or BUST...and I'll explain in detail.

We've seen what Obama is all about. I am as guilty as the next guy, because I bought into his load of crap and voted for him. I didn't realize that he had grown up abroad and had some kind of chip on his shoulder when it came to the concept of liberty...but it's clear that he does. He's done PLENTY for large banks and corporations, but NOTHING for ANY of the people who flocked to polls in record numbers to elect him. He's a PUPPET.

Mitt Romney is as fake as they come. He's already shown us that he has no problem with lying in order to get elected. He'll be just as good of a friend to the corrupt and elite as the current administration. Bottom line: Another Puppet.

Then we have Newt Gingrich. What a guy...I mean, REALLY? Newt's buying his third wife (& former mistress) jewelry from Cartier with money that he made "advising" a company that subsequently required a taxpayer bail-out. Keep in mind that this is the same guy that criticized Clinton for getting a BJ from a fat girl, all while he's 5 or 6 years deep in nailing a congressional aide on the side. What's to say that Newt's not going to do the same things Obama is doing now if he were to get elected? Even Reagan didn't like the guy. He's a weak link.

Santorum would make important decisions with the King James Version of Mattel's Magic 8-ball. The only reason that he "won" Iowa is that some GOP-insider got caught hiding votes trying to prevent a Paul victory at all costs, and they had to give those votes to someone other than Romney or Gingrich. They sure as heck weren't giving them to Ron Paul. They're AFRAID of Ron Paul.

Why? The elite DON'T FEEL THE RECESSION...in fact, they're actually PROFITING from it. Why would they want someone to come in and make things right again? They don't want to rock the boat, but they know that they can't keep Obama in there the way that they did Bush...they need a new face to keep the game going for another 4 to 8 years.

Ready for the truth about Ron Paul? He's a 12-term congressman that's been warning us of the pending financial crisis for over a decade. It's all public record...he can't be bought. He's says the same things now that he's been saying for 10 years, and people are finally listening to what HE says instead of what the corporate-owned mainstream-media has tried to tell us about him. Investigate and decide for yourself:

Ron Paul's Congressional Voting Record -

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/member...

Ron Paul on the Issues-

http://www.ontheissues.org/TX/Ron_Paul.htm%C3%82 

Ron Paul on Bill Maher during the '08 campaign-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_KkegqMIsA&sns=em

(Pay attention to the comment Maher makes about Romney at the very end of the clip...and keep in mind that this was back in '08)

This is a compilation from the current campaign-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-ia2KC_E0Y&sns=em

Last but not least, watch this ad in its entirety...the footage is all legit no special effects were used to make him look younger...HE'S BEEN TRYING TO WARN US FOR A WHILE. Go ahead. Watch it. If this doesn't change your mind, then there's probably something wrong with YOU-

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAulpWLZC2Y&sns=em

Ron Paul 2012

Come on, you cannot be that ignorant are you? Benevolent concern my man. It is the rule.

"It means maybe that research lab on the cusp of a lifesaving discovery, or the company looking for skilled workers is going to do a little bit better, and we'll all do better as a consequence. It makes economic sense. But part of that belief comes from my faith in the idea that I am my brother's keeper and I am my sister's keeper; that as a country, we rise and fall together. I'm not an island. I'm not alone in my success. I succeed because others succeed with me." President Obama

He who oppresses the poor shows contempt for their Maker,but whoever is kind to the needy honors God.

Proverbs 14:31

"Leadership gains authority and respect when the voiceless poor are treated fairly." Proverbs 29:14

4 more years??

do you just forgot something?

21 December 2012 The New Big Bang..!!!

The only worse option I can think of than 4 more years of Obama would be dragging Ralph Nader out of the scrapyard.

I cannot stand listening to Ron Paul's fanbase make idiots out of themselves, and I can't stand Romney's lack of control over his own campaign members, or Santorum's whiny attitude. Gingrich is the only one left, and he's not a perfect individual- nobody is- but he is by far the most knowledgeable of any of them.

I like all the the GOP contenders, and would be happy with any. However, I believe Romney is the most electable.

Of course the country will survive with Obama as president. The claims to the contrary are just silly. I think the GOP field is a poor one.

Anyone with a brain realizes the country will survive. It will most likely survive no matter who is in office.

Any of those 4 will do, but Obama next for years are the same thing as voting for a man without a conscience, because he won't have to worry about re-election. The shackles will come off and his true agenda will come out for all to fear.

Elect the only person who is not singularly focused on beating his competition. Obama

Gingrich wants to build space colonies. That's not expensive or wasteful.

Santorum has no plan to balance the budget

Romney clearly will be a liberal when it suits him and a Conservative when the time seems right. He will govern as a liberal as he did as governor. Wonder why he wasn't asked to serve again...