4 Gay religious folks: If Gay life is morally right, then why?

Is incest morally right? They can produce offspring.

Is rape morally right? It produces offspring too!

The Bible condemns mixing animals of different species, yet we have hybrid animals (some of whom can also produce offspring).

Biological reproduction has nothing to do with morality, nor does morality have anything to do with biological reproduction. By your logic, anyone who cannot produce offspring are morally wrong. So that means that the many heterosexual, married couples who pray to God every day for a child, yet cannot have one due to infertility or some other physiological problem are morally wrong. Old people who can no longer reproduce are morally wrong for being together and having relations.

You condemn many with your ill thought out argument.

If God thinks gays are so evil, why did he create them?

If heterosexuality is so righteous, why do straight couples keep making gay kids?

"Why can't two women or two men produce offspring to continue their morality if that was proper?"

Are you also suggesting that sterile couples, old couples and those who choose not to have children are also "immoral"? Gay men and women may have children through non-conventional means, such as adoption or insemination.

"Why the man can't produce off springs without a women or a women bring forth without a man, if man to woman is not the proper way?"

This is a reproduction matter, and has nothing to do with morality. There are other methods of having children, other than adoption.

Heterosexuals will always outweigh the number of homosexuals, so the scenario of all people being gay, and thus "humanity ceases to exist" is unrealistic.

Assuming that being able to reproduce with your partner makes someone 'moral'? Do you have the same feelings towards straight couples who can't reproduce together? Or couples who simply don't want to have children, even though they can?

"If everyone was gay, humanity would cease, because gay is improper answers to why gays must adopt in order to have children."

Where are you people getting this crazy scenario? Not everyone is gay. We apparently only make up 10% of the population, we've been around since the dawn of time, and so far not everyone in the whole world woken up and 'turned gay'.

The human race is not on the verge of extinction so why are you even making an issue about people not reproducing? And why do you fail to realize that being gay does not make someone sterile or infertile? Many gay couples have and always will utilize sperm banks, artificial insemination, and surrogacy to bring children into the world. So you logic flawed and silly. Your arguments hold no water and you're simply disillusioned about this whole thing.

Yes but everyone is not gay. Procreation is the main aim of evolution but we humans don't have to give in to it. We work round it in lots of ways - we care for our young and our elderly and our disabled and we use contraception. I hear some religious people claim that contraception is immoral but when was the last time you heard a religious person use your argument about our vulnerable? Why can't babies and elderly and disabled people take care of themselves if God meant them to live? Clearly he didn't then and it is immoral to go against him.

( I am unable to have children and feel perfectly morally justified in being married too)

no longer all religions are anti-gay. most of the Neo-Pagan religions are gay-impartial, and commonly they are gay-sensible. we are no longer all like particular fundamentalist strains of Christianity. there is not any longer sufficient love and amusement contained in the global; i might want to furnish advantages to all and multiple who well-knownshows it, with harm to none. ETA: in accordance to Kaye... "even with the indisputable fact that, gays do no longer reproduce, which thins human's already skinny inhabitants."... what planet are YOU residing on??? And do you easily have self assurance that right now couples who do not plan to have toddlers must be forbidden from having relationships/getting married?

Bananas also can't reproduce naturally. Neither can many bulldogs. Both need human assistance to do so.

Where's your moral stance against them?

I see. And all this 'proper' sexual activity has produced an overcrowded, overburdoned planet. Clever that, eh?

The world is overpopulated so a few gays here and there wouldnt hurt.

It must be nice to have a deity that conveniently hates the same things you do.

wait, but that means most of the good stuff straight couples can do is also improper...