Did you know that it has been proven that Evolution is wrong?

The evidence for evolution is and has been interpreted from a Philosophical and ideological Bias, The answers given by adherents to Evolution here in R&S is proof of the bias and agenda, Atheism has to have an alternate explanation—other than a Creator—for how the universe and life came into existence.

Darwin once identified himself as a Christian but as a result of some tragedies that took place in his life, he later renounced the Christian faith and the existence of God. Evolution was invented by an atheist.

What is sad is that Christians are falling into this Trap and trying to fit evolution into the Bible (Theistic Evolution) thinking they can make it fit.

Lee Stroble in his video listed below “ The Case for the Creator” stated (5 min. 28 sec into the video) The Case for a Creator

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6881114962...

That “There is no way you can Harmonize Neo Darwinism with Christianity, I could never understand Christians who would say “ Well I believe in God yet I believe in Evolution as well” You see Darwin’s idea about the development of life led to his theory that modern science now generally defines as an undirected process completely devoid of any purpose or plan,”. Now how could God direct an undirected process? How could God have purpose in a plan behind a system that has no plan and no purpose? It just does not make sense.

It didn’t make sense to me in 1966 and it doesn’t make sense to me now.

The Apostle Paul wrote to His Son Timothy stating that “ in 2 Timothy 4:3-4 “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, [because] they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn [their] ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables.”

Those Christians who believe in evolution have no idea how that effects their theology.

What is theistic evolution?

http://www.gotquestions.org/theistic-evolution.htm...

http://carm.org/secular-movements/evolution/theist...

Eternity is a Long Time to be wrong about this

What Hath Darwin Wrought?

http://www.whathathdarwinwrought.com/

Darwin's Deadly Legacy (1 of 7)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mxXICZ9mXo

Creation In The 21st Century - Planet Earth Is Special 1 of 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk8xtXRI6OE

Creation in the 21st Century - The Evidence Disputes Darwin 1 of 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FaveDbWrQuQ&feature...

Creation in the 21st Century - The Evidence Disputes Darwin 2 of 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZFIe2zk1fw&feature...

Some modern scientists who have accepted the biblical account of creation

http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/bios/

More than 600 Scientist with PHD’s who have Signed A SCIENTIFIC DISSENT FROM DARWINISM

“We are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life.

Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged.”

http://www.discovery.org/scripts/viewDB/filesDB-do...

Newton's first law of relativity? lol.

There is Gallilean-Newtonian relativity which is Galillean relativity supplemented by Newton's laws of motion.

Newton's first law of motion states that a body will remain at rest or in uniform motion unless acted upon by another force.

The law you are stating is called the second law of thermodynamics and it deals with heat transfer not physical matter, all matter left unattended will look for the lowest energy state. That doesn't necessarily mean chaos, just look at crystal formation to see a system build from a state of very chaotic molecular interraction (supersaturated hot water), to cold water with crystals growing in it (less chaotic).

1) newton never had a law of relativity, that was einstein

2) newton's first lawstates that: "Every object continues in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a straight line, unless compelled to change that state by external forces acted upon it" and has nothing to do with either the big bang or evolution.

3) the big bang and evolution have nothing to do with eachother, big bang tries to explain the origin of the universe, the theory of evolution tries to explain the divercity of life

try and form an organised thought before mashing your keyboard next time

you ought to no longer be doing any analyze in arguments for and adverse to the perception of Evolution in case you are able to't even construct a grammatical sentence in English! supply up utilising textual content communicate. i do not care if you're between the fortunate few who could have the funds for a web connection on your cellular. For technological information questions use formal English in case you desire a severe answer! You question could were: How am i able to argue adverse to the perception of evolution? i'm attempting to ascertain who if everyone has argued adverse to the perception of Evolution and what replaced into the concept of their arguments. I also recognize to understand what forms of arguments must be made adverse to the perception of Evolution in its modern variety and who's doing so and why? Are they utilising clinical info or jsut arguing from what they see as logical flaws contained in the present concept? Ask a severe thoughtful question like this and also you ought to get severe solutions!

Actually, that's entirely untrue. You need to go back and study.

First, that refers to a closed system (meaning no outside interaction), and evolution is entirely about interaction from outside the system.

Second, evolution has nothing to do with the big bang.

Basically, three fails in one short post, not including the purile misspelling of a word.

1. The big bang represented the lowest entropy of the universe. from there it increases as we see

2. Movement of local entropy to a lower entropy condition (more ordered) is perfectly acceptable in thermodynamics as long as the system is open. That is, we get solar energy from the sun which allows local decreases in entropy (has to be true, plants make sugars from carbon dioxide, sunglight, and water every day--movement from less order to greater order). The over all entropy of the sun earth system however increases.

sorry bill, you need an education

You don't understand what Newton's Second law means. This line of 'logic' has been categorically defeated time and time again, to the point that you're either an epic troll, or have never used the internet to answer your own questions.

You're right Bill~ The second law of thermodynamics says that the material world is winding down and deteriorating.

The exact opposite of the theory of evolution.

Is that why the Catholic church, at one time the only Christian organization in existence, has fractured so dramatically into the many many sects we have today? Chaos can only increase, so Christianity, or any religion actually, is doomed to chaotic dogma, chaotic believers, and generally....chaos.

If you are at least 16 years of age, do you remember how you looked at age 10?

If you place a picture of yourself at a younger age on the mirror, and then look at yourself now in the mirror, what do you see?

What name covers the "change" in yourself you observe? The name is "evolution".

Peace