Why doesn't the media Cover Ron Paul?

This is an example of why our Democracy is so pointless. Not anyone can run, really. While I refuse to subscribe to extreme conspiracy theories, I will, however, point out our overt two-party system, which hasn't produced us with good candidates for two centuries.

Yes, Ron Paul is a great leader and would make a great president.

However, In spite of this common sense approach, the party has not gathered behind Ron Paul. The reason for this lack of support (though his supporters are adamant) is more than his visual appeal. Paul's platform is so different that his opponents have attacked him relentlessly. They suggest that Ron Paul is too radical to be elected.

There is no reason to cover Ron Paul. Ron Paul has run for president three times and has failed to get any significant amount of votes.

Few people will vote for Ron Paul.

Because Ron Paul is out of the race. Gary Johnson, however, is still in. Paulistas should support Johnson.

who is ron paul

WHY AM I AROUSED?