Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Jericho dGr8 asked in SportsWrestling · 9 years ago

which WWE superstar best defined “attitude”, after the attitude era.?

which superstar best defined “attitude”, after the attitude era?

1. Kurt Angle?

2. Chris Jericho?

3. CM Punk?

4. or ......?

give your reason

9 Answers

Relevance
  • Favorite Answer

    It was actually Stephanie McMahon when one thinks about it.

  • 9 years ago

    CM Punk definitely. Those pipe bombs were awesome. Nobody disrespected Vince like that since Stone Cold. Stone Cold was the attitude era. CM Punk has all the attitude now.

  • 9 years ago

    Great question. While Angle and Jericho are great choices I would have to say Batista. He had great over the top promos(when they let him) like the Rock and Austin had in the past.

  • 9 years ago

    Brock Lesnar in my opinion!

    He's got that badass "I don't give a damn about rules and regulations, I just do what I when when I want" attitude as well as being a devastating war machine.

    He brutalizes his opponents, gets off by dominating people and cuts badass promos.

    He is an embodiment of attitude.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 5 years ago

    that's the project with those old followers. they don't prefer to confess that physique of strategies era is over for sturdy and WWE has moved directly to a minimum of a few thing diverse, PG era. I grew up observing WWF/E decrease back in 1991, and that i for one have moved on the reality that physique of strategies era is over. i'm happy with it. yet those IWC marks think of that they comprehend each and every thing. i will assure you, if those IWC marks might've been in fee of WWE then they does not final even at some point. physique of strategies era began simply by fact WWE have been given a real opposition from WCW. And as of excellent now there might not be a contest for WWE. TNA isn't a contest for WWE. TNA would not degree as much as WWE. So I for one am happy with WWE as that's sturdy now. even regardless of the incontrovertible fact that I each and every each and every now and then get somewhat upset with how WWE performs out particular stoylines at the instant in WWE, base line is i'm nevertheless prepared on old college wrestling (physique of strategies era) and WWE nowdays. and that i wish those old WWE followers admit that physique of strategies era is finished. WQ: in my opinion, i'm going to %. ECW. simply by fact it has extra intensity and is extra outstanding. NXT purely had one sturdy seasson, and that became into the 1st season whilst Wade Barrett gained NXT. After that, NXT is going downhill. WQ2: No, TNA might not be a great hazard to WWE in any years yet to come back. the reason of that's hassle-free, WWE has extra skills than TNA and WWE gets extra scores and visitors. WWE has extra intensity on their roster, and WWE is aired on extra beneficial venue. WWE as an entire will in simple terms get greater and better for the years yet to come back, at the same time as TNA will war with their a million.0 scores and undesirable bothces (Pun meant).

  • Anonymous
    9 years ago

    Jericho.

  • Randy Orton, he disrespected legends and all of that stuff with the McMahons (including HHH).

  • 9 years ago

    I'd say Edge. During his Feud with Undertaker..!!

  • 9 years ago

    Michelle mccool defenitly

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.