Do any of the presidential candidates have an opinion on the union of the United States with Canada and Mexico?

Only Obama knows where Canada is and he is for North American free trade...and has been only one who acknowledges Canada as partner...this countries number one oil importer

romney only see tar sands and money...calls it North America's oil...

http://www.usconstitution.net/articles.html

Canada only country that can join it see article x1 confederation..lol

http://www.vancouversun.com/Canadians+Obama+better...

None have done so publicly, as this is about as welcomed as a Reggae band at a klan rally, but privately, I am sure some are in favour of such agreements. The best person on this subject was Ron Paul, though sometimes he says some of the stupidest things, his core independent/isolationist beliefs are best for the country in this arena. It is far more likely that Mitt Romney and not Obama would be the most likely to endorse free trade policies. Further to the point, NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement), was a Republican / corporation love-child, but was put into effect by Bill Clinton. Bill Clinton, regardless of what you may think of him, honestly, nobody can truly say he was a liberal, which is the fear I have of Obama somewhat. However, I feel Obama still clings to some of his liberal activist beliefs, which if reelected, should keep him from enacting anymore free trade agreements.

Will do! thank you! And to the felllow that stated "taking" Mexico, like we did California and Texas: a million) No thank you. Mexico is a disaster. "Taking them" might in ordinary terms make issues worse. 2) learn American history. We PAID for California outright. Mexico somewhat had any settlements in CA in any respect. The Mexican "government" did no longer comprehend what to DO with the land - so they bought it for funds. Texas replaced into gained in a legal conflict. which ability the two aspects signed off, on the top of the conflict. And the Mexicans weren't battling for "freedom" - the TEXANS have been. Santa Ana actually had to set himself up as a king. The Ruling classification of Mexico has continually created a Feudal gadget - the coolest , and the Serfs. an excellent form of Mexicans fought on the ingredient OF the Texans - casue they knew what a gaggle of vicious dirtbags thier Overlords have been. And ARE. Mexico has been around longer, as a rustic, than the u . s .. they have by no ability been in a position to get it jointly. they seem to be a international comedian tale - and an utter shame.

As that is not now, has never been, and will not be considered, I would say "No".