Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
I have fx 6100 AMD, what would be better?
Mother board is sabertooth fx 990 ? r2.0, if I was to try to get a faster cpu is it possible? current speed is 3.31 , don,t want hear about Intel I know about them. I am told the 8100 is really slower?
2 Answers
- 9 years agoFavorite Answer
A lot of things are possible. 3.31 is not a limit. My Intel i7 is 3.5 (OC 3.9). I know for a fact AMD has faster CPU's. It will simply cost more.
Check out this.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N8...
It is 3.5 and it ia only about 60 dollars more.
This one is a 8 Core compared to your six core and its turbo is 4.0GHz.
I would recommend that!
Source(s): Knowledge. - wexlerLv 44 years ago
as long as you have an excellent to sturdy pix card, then it will be positive. present day gaming on a laptop is lots greater based upon the pix card, than upon the CPU. So in case you got working example a GTX 660 Ti pix card, and coupled it up with a FX 6100 CPU, then it may be superb for gaming. yet status by utilising itself, the FX 6100 isn't that great of a processor, and is unquestionably bested by utilising any mid-point quad middle Intel chip (like the i5 3550, or i5 3570k, or maybe final generations i5 2400, or 2500k). in case you like AMD then decide for it, its your money. basically make particular to get a sturdy pix card or it wont count. yet i prefer to advise getting an Intel CPU. you would be greater advantageous off in the long-term.