Policemen, how often do you abide by your sworn oath.?

Question

..Are there any coppers on here who would like to explain their viewpoint regarding being a Peace officer.
Is it seen as being a bit mamby pamby upholding your sworn oath to uphold the Law of the Land and act accordingly.

You all swear this oath to serve and protect us the sovereign citizens, however oh so many times we are treated with aggression and hostility.

Anyone who deals with the general public knows only too well what a massive pain in the rear some can be, however we also know that we do meet some warm friendly and law abiding majority.

Your obsession with your Police Officers job of obtaining fraudulantly revenue for your corporation seems to occupy the major part of your shift along with unlawfully detaining law abiding citizens, demanding identification and what business we have for simply walking along the public footpath or driving our cars on our public roads.

Can you not wonder why the citizens you are sworn to serve get so irrate at you for delaying and harrassing us.

Your job is hard enough, why make it harder with this alianation. You are putting bread on your table and a roof over your families heads just like us.

Are you baited like dogs by your superiors to hit the streets and have a superior arrogant attidude and take no **** from anyone.

We are about to see normally unthinkable civil disobedience and public demonstrations and protests, but instead of having empathy with us you dress up like robo cop raise your batons and charge into fellow citizens who are exercising our birthright to disagree with matters deemed wrong.

No one appointed you judge, to remove our rights as its not your job to do so.

I sincerely would like some inteligent response from you as some of your behaviours are very difficult to fathem.

Anonymous · Accepted Answer

Sorry, I fell asleep halfway through your rant.

the c · Answer

More freeman on the land nonsense.  The criminal justice system loses a lot of money and wastes a lot too.  The amount extracted from fines is not significant.  When the court awards costs to the guilty they normally don't charge more than a few hundred pounds, once you factor in police wages, CPS wages, defence solicitors pay (legal aid) and court staff pay; the tax payer is well out of pocket.

As to stopping law abiding citizens that very rarely happens, most of the time I interact with people they have a criminal history so aren't these law abiding citizens you speak of.  

The final part about the 'right' to disagree, yes that is fine however you don't have a right to breach the peace or prevent others going about their lawful activities.  If you do that then you can expect me to try to stop you.  If you want to change the system do it by political means, but you can't as most reject your outlandish and ridiculous beliefs.

Me · Answer

If you want an intelligent answer, you must ask an intelligent question.

Let me guess, you got a ticket and refuse to accept responsibility?

By the way, I just reported dozens or your "questions" that are senseless rants. Be prepared for an inbox full of violations.

Anonymous · Answer

understanding is ability: bypass by technique of your own suggestion and seem for understanding. examine the structure and teach me how even your warped definition of Progressivism is in besides unconstitutional. The structure says no longer something about 'favoring' something. in truth, having differing political outlooks or aims is the very element of the structure. effectively, your use of the note Progessivism is incomprehensible besides, it is your note, your definition, and has no relationship with any exterior meaning.

Anonymous · Answer

You seem to have a big problem with the police and law and order.

Trending News

Policemen, how often do you abide by your sworn oath.?

5 Answers