Is Obama losing his Dem support on his Benghazi spin?

Losing popularity, perhaps, but the BIG question is how can the F'ed up left wing support their position to re-hire his a$$-clown ?

Oh, its ok to swoon over whines and cry's from victims of sandy hook or any of the others to make a political push for more gun control laws (which we have enough of)

But no one on the left seems focused on the governments cavalier attitude toward enforcing the laws already on the books. As USUAL, they don't hold government accountable for their failings for fear that they might not get their government cheese in the future.

Its ok to demonize Bush for not having clairvoyance to see 9/11 before it happened........OH, but Obama and his administration directly getting involved with terror attacks on our embassy....telling people to stand down, to do nothing ? Oh, that's ok.........all because.......what ? He's black ? He's a Democrat ?

Because the fake media has created an impression that America likes this fraud in Chief ?

Obama Failed big time. he didn't keep our people safe, they denied added security, they didn't have adequate security to begin with and actively and knowingly sent these people to their deaths by denying help from the SAS and telling our own troops to stand down.

THIS FRAUD PIECE OF CRAP ISN"T WORTHY OF REPRESENTING AMERICA

I guess why the loser left doesn't get the clue why its important is because these F'ers aren't going to pick up a gun and defend our country over seas, these pricks aren't going to put themselves in a position that the presidents decisions are going to adversely effect them. They think they won't have to worry over any future decisions that come from the white house.

what selfish, stupid bastards

No.

It would have been extremely irresponsible to mention al-Qaeda at that time because there was no confirmation of the exact cause. At the time, Susan Rice mentioned the theory that it was related to a protest. Lacking more definitive information, that was the only responsible thing to do.

Lynch also admits he does not know what process was used to vet the statements. In retrospect, maybe it wasn't accurate, but at the time, it was never presented as being the absolute cause, and there was no compelling evidence that it was anything else.

What is the question? Did Rice knowingly lie? No. Did anyone know for sure the day after the attack the exact cause? No. Do we even to this day know all of the events that led to the attack? No.

To this day is there any definitive evidence that the attack was pre-planned by al-Qaeda? No there isn't.

So what burning question is going unanswered?

In 2012 President Obama erroneously blames a Youtube video for the deaths of 4 American's. You would think the sky had just fallen. The result has been an endless series of Congressional hearings, partisan news coverage and calls for impeachment from people who have never apparently read the constitution.

OTOH - In 2003 George W. Bush unilaterally and illegally decided to enforce a U.N. Resolution without getting the required authorization to do so from the U.N. (for the simple reason he wouldn't have got it). The result was the deaths of 6,000 American's, 120,000+ Iraqi's and the loss of a few trillion dollars of American treasure, and all based on what? A fantasy of non-existent WMD programs and non-existent ties to terrorist organizations. It was all made-up! Fabricated. A deliberate distortion. Every bit of it. And we know it was deliberate because the administration had all the correct information but decided to run with their version of reality-distortion instead.

Sound familiar?

When do we get Congressional hearings about that? When do the families of those dead soldiers get accountability on that? When do the taxpayers?

And why is blaming the deaths of 4 American's on a video the biggest scandal in American history but we get not a whimper about lying to start an illegal war that killed 6,000 Americans? Heck if only attacks on diplomatic stations count and not wars during the Bush years you have 11 of those and 60 deaths - no Congressional hearings, no endless coverage on Fox News.

I have a beef with those who turn a blind eye to atrocity when its from their side but go ape **** crazy when the Obama administration gives some faulty information. I see no moral consistency. I'm perfectly happy to condemn anyone who lied or covered up facts that led to the death of Americans.

Are you?

I was really getting worried, it had been 8 minutes since the last question about Benghazi, I thought maybe something happened to all the Republicans. Glad you're OK.

Benghazi question count: 1,000,000,517

Yes he should be impeached.

No, that is wishful thinking on TeAtarDs part.What;'s the BIG deal about Benghazi anyhow?

Obama isn't running for office.

yes he is