Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

indoubt asked in SportsRugby · 8 years ago

Is Rugby League safer than Rugby Union?

I have recently started watching rugby and I wounder that. I thought that because the Rugby League scrum looks less physical and because they can get up after tackle.

6 Answers

Relevance
  • blm
    Lv 7
    8 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Interesting question. I haven't actually seen any sports medicine studies which compare League and Union -- the research tends to orient more towards comparing Union with gridiron football.

    You're right in one sense -- League scrums aren't physical at all and some of your more catastrophic (although fortunately, very rare) injuries in Union come during a scrum collapse. And I've seen a number of broken collarbones as a result of jumpers coming down hard (or being outright dropped) during a lineout, something else which League players don't have to deal with. Rucking , on the other hand, looks dangerous, but if you don't count the basically cosmetic cuts and scrapes that come with getting stepped on -- well I've never seen someone actually have to leave a game as a consequence of a rucking injury.

    All that said, the nature of the tackles in a League game are different, as it's more important with the six-downs-to-score to stop the runners forward progress, particularly as you aren't allowed to swipe the ball after the tackle. And League defenders do get more of a run at their opponents as they have to get back ten metres after a tackle, rather than the two or three metres more typical of a Union rucking situation. This is an issue the NRL addressed recently when it banned shoulder charges.

    It would be interesting to see a scientific study, but in my own (utterly unscientific) assessment I don't really have any sense that either version of rugby is significantly more dangerous than the other.

    Edit@Uncas. You're a little out of date. Like I said, the NRL has banned shoulder charges.

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    In Rugby League there is no rucking, therefore that takes a lot of danger out of the sport as people have been know to break there necks or have other serious injuries in rucks. However the tackling is very much the same n both sports, the reason you may have seen people get up straight after tackles i League is because the person who tackled them has to straight away get of the player. Also the men in League tend to be smaller than the men in union, therefore tackles no hurting as much. But yes over all League is safer than Union.

  • Ace
    Lv 4
    8 years ago

    In my opinion i think it depends on if you are a back or a forward, the most serious injuries happens in the scrum so there union is much more dangerous but in league tackles that would have gotten you yellow in union is allowed so i think league is more dangerous for the backs

  • 8 years ago

    no because in Rugby league you can do shoulder charge which is very dangerous while in Rugby Union you can't

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 8 years ago

    yes, rugby union is such a physical game!!

  • Anonymous
    8 years ago

    It is for flankers.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.