What's the difference between an Unborn Child and a Convicted Felon?

Liberals cry when a Convicted Felon Serial Murderer is executed but Liberals don't bat an eye when an Innocent Unborn Child is murdered by an abortion

an Unborn Child life is disposable while a human being isn't

although of course granted a person could argue a fetus clearly is alive and a member of a particular type of specie homosapien nevertheless when we ask the question what exactly makes human life so precise the reasoning is not simply being alive as life is deming everywhere being even something a dog can do. what fundamentally gives our life importance is rather the fact we are not only in the world but a part of it being fully aware of our existence, expressing the egress of emotion, having goals and ambitions possessing the capacity in desiring to continue living. however this obviously doesn’t apply to the fetus having no fears, knowledge or memories only possessing potential no different than the sperm loss when one ejaculates

A liberal thinks nothing of butchering an unborn child but will do anything possible to save the life of a cold blooded murderer.

An unborn child is a fetus and cannot survive on its own. A felon is an adult who has been convicted of a crime.

Why don't cons care about children after they are born?

The GOP wants to slash WIC benifits, foodstamps and education.

They want to deport kids to countries they haven't been to since they were babies.

They sceam about totolitarian oppression if anyone suggests sensable regulations to keep guns out of the hands of criminals and the mentally disturbed.

The GOP is anti women, anti choice and anti child.

The unborn child can't hire a Liberal Lawyer.

Convicted felons are guaranteed a roof over their head, three square meals a day, and free medical care---for as long as they are in the custody of the state. The unborn child is subject to premeditated murder in the first degree-----and the child has committed NO crime.

One lost the right to vote and possess firearms. the other must rely on a generous and caring father to allow them to have a firearm, or until they complete enough trips around the sun, then they may have both.

the felon has more rights.

Conservatives think it's ok to violate the human rights of the one that is actually a human being. This is only true if it is in a "tough on crime" unit like Sherriff Joe Arpaio's torture camps and not hard labor camps in some communist hell hole though. That's right. Cons would reserve the violating of human rights all for themselves because Americans can beat other Americans in a more humane way than China can beat their people.