Is this poem to abstract?

This has the distinguished air of a soliloquy

and the joy of offering your readers

a visual and emotional sense of repose.

It is more psychological/spirit - ed than abstract.

Noticeably pleasing, it has a reconciling, upbeat tone

throughout its` panoramas both tranquil

attractively intriguing lovely opening line), and turbulent.

Your repetition of exactly the most inward two lines

has this a really enjoyable glimpse of nature and mankind`s

healing and the narrator`s contemplative relishing of the question

is shared most generously.

Thanks, I enjoyed

every line and image of this journey./ gazing, with you Fredric.

A well structured poem questioning

the "why and how our senses formulate

our perceptions, depending on emotion

and preconceived theories.

There will always be vairables, never absolutes,

for alternatives can interupt the outcome, without warning.

.It's an observational and very interesting

"thinking out loud" piece of prose I found enjoyable.

From all forms of "The Arts", I forward the theory:

"Abstracts can never be,

by their nature, be limited to pre-set rules

or guidlines for acceptance"

Not enough, too much or the word "no"

can't be relegated to the term, "Abstract".

Contemplative and well written, Fred.

Too abstract, Frederic. But interesting.

Your poem implies that only humans can appreciate nature's beauty, and this is a very interesting idea. Great poem, Fred.

Skies don't "lay still." They "LIE still."