If the pause lasts another 3 years do you think President Clinton will?

What part of There is no pause in GW don't you ;lame deniers understand. seen elementary school children with more educational sophistication

Hillary will not likely be president. She is not good at debate, she is not terribly likable and she will be nearly 70 when she runs.

Obama has only been able to hold onto the presidency by his ability to get the black and hispanic voters and the young out in numbers. His charisma draws out the people who would not normally vote. Hillary, on the other hand, will get the young, hispanic and black vote, but they will not be voting in masses. Their voting will go back to their old levels. While Hillary has a slight advantage for the female vote, she will get beat down so badly in the debates, that she just really won't have a prayer.

She can't distance herself from Obama wihtout angering the minorities, BUT she can't get the minorities to come out in masses. And Obama's popularity is a serious problem.

One of the biggest things that determine the ability of a president to get elected, is the old "would you like to have a beer with them". Hillary fails this test miserably. Whether or not you like her politics, she is simply nto electable.

As for the AGW movement. It is dying a slow death. You can even see the results in this section. I used to come here frequently 3 years ago. There were questions asked at a rate of about 1 every 2 minutes. Now it is almost dead with only the same core of people still rehashing the same questions.

The other difference is that I don't see Dana. I told him the cap and trade would never pass and that they would not be able to get anything remotely looking like a climate bill through until 2016 IF AND ONLY IF they continued to see a rise. He cursed me and called me an idiot. I am guessing he does not still hold the same view of my prediction.

I also predicted a repub president, so I got that wrong. I had no idea that they would actually run Romneybot. I am in disbelief that they would put up someone so stiff. It is like the repubs wanted to lose. I actually knew they would lose right when they put him up and still it was very close. The fact that it was even close against Romneybot, shows how far Obama had slipped.

First I find it hillarious when the TRUE science DENIERS like C say there is no pause. I have not seen a sinlge relevant scientific organization refute the "pause" Even the IPCC, gasp, acknowledge the pause.

for an answer to your quesiton. Will they still seek to spend money on the AGW issue? Yes, if they see potential political of financial gain. The answer will be NO if they see more risk than gain. Its that simple.

It depends. If President Clinton is interested in science, then yes.

If she is more interested in making the teabaggers happy, then she won't.

<First I find it hillarious when the TRUE science DENIERS like C say there is no pause.>

If you want realists to believe in the pause, tell us when it began, according to the GISS dataset. Hint: it wasn't 17 years ago, even in HadCRUT3, never mind GISS.

http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3vgl/from:...

<I have not seen a sinlge relevant scientific organization refute the "pause" Even the IPCC, gasp, acknowledge the pause.>

So, now we are supposed to listen to relevant scientific organizations. Would "Lord" Muttonhead approve? At this rate, we will soon be listening to James Hansen.

Considering the money is spent on innovation, new industries, diversity of energy resources, improved infrastructure, pollution reduction etc. etc. I think the money will continue to be spent as it provides a healthier community and improved environment for the whole community.

It is not about climate.

Quote by Ottmar Edenhoffer, high level UN-IPCC official: "We redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy...Basically it's a big mistake to discuss climate policy separately from the major themes of globalization...One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore."

These rip off artists have a great scam going, and they will continue it no matter what the temperature does.

President Who??? She was responsible for the murder of 4 Americans in Benghazi. She couldn't take care of Four Americans and we are supposed to trust her to protect an entire country???

I think not!

Only time will tell