Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Does it seem unrealistic to allow a system of thought that does not allow for all variables,?

define your conclusion of correctness in your world view?

Perhaps more pointed, would be the observation that in the pursuit of science, having seen the "things that seem like the product of design" of the universe (as per Dawkins), and all its parts, still the atheist scientist excludes from their reasoning anything that smacks of the metaphysical.

It might be compared to the patron of a restaurant, and suggesting after having eaten what he ordered,

---that the paper and ink the menu presented, had organized itself ideally to produce the meal.

He excludes the idea of

---an author that wrote the menu,

---an owner that built the restaurant,

---and the agent of the author/owner who assembled the meal.

This same patron then defends his observance with vehemence and jeers to all who might consider such things as "an owner/author with a design to feed people from His restaurant," as viable.

How can we allow such singularity of thought and prejudice of reason define our world view?

Update:

J

How appropriate that you would suggest the menu is not evidence....

---and what of the meal?

Update 2:

And yet, when choosing from the menu and ordering, you receive a meal?

Not by magic, but simply because that was the intended idea.

Update 3:

Oh yes, J, by the way, some claim they have met the owner of the restaurant, who told them He wrote the menu (and built the restaurant).

Update 4:

biggalloot

....or the toothfairy, or the Easter Bunny, etc etc... except, they haven't written a menu, have they?

Update 5:

biggaloot... the Bible?

8 Answers

Relevance
  • 7 years ago
    Favorite Answer

    Yes, it SEEMS like there must be some design. I GUESS that there is / was.

    You GUESS too. That's all any of us can do. All our armchair arguing with each other is nonsense. None of us can do anything more than conjecture.

  • 7 years ago

    Science is a disciplined process designed to eliminate opinion and make actual fact the deciding factor.

    Your methodology would depend completely on opinion and make facts irrelevant. It would have no more validity than a cable TV show on Bigfoot.

    EDIT: I think your analogy needs work. A menu and food are actual and measurable. Once you move to an invisible menu, things change. Or do you have a copy of a menu to share with us?

  • 7 years ago

    What's the difference between metaphysical and nonexistent? I don't believe there is one FYI.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    Because in the real world science is very different from what you claim. It is described quite satisfactorily in any competent school.

    Source(s): .
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • It may vary with how asker means that. Focus on one or more variables is Good; PROvided that one allows for other variables.

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    yes and know. the greatest sum of ones worth is the sky

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    "metaphysical", "supernatural" and "goddunnit" are all words that mean pretend.

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    science scmhience....BORING

    Next question please

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.