Beyond

...what force on earth would cause the object to move rearward in a forward moving truck?

I wonder if any techs might know right off the bat by that description what the problem might be, and how I might fix it?

Just think of it. Trump is such an amazing spectacle of contrast to the practiced and polished politics of Clinton, that ideally for her, he overshadows all of her less presidential features, making her the obvious sane choice.

Given a real presidential candidate, with moral strength, political prowess, and an above average background in public service, and both of these would be presidents would be jailed.

Is it possible someone in the wings might even now, late in the game, fill that bill?

I recently bought a hobby scale stick welder for use on some thin steel projects. It requires a 20 amp breaker, and I'm assuming that would be the peak draw for its heaviest jobs. If all I am doing is light jobs, with minimal requirement for penetration, would it be likely a 15 amp breaker would hold up?

and was born of the virgin Mary, ...and that His birth was brought about by an act of God.

How then is it possible He is NOT the Son of God?

What year did GM change their 8 bolt wheel patten? I have an older GM that needs a wheel upgrade... What's the newest year I could buy?

Our complexity includes second guessing what might otherwise be a "natural" action. Perhaps we do so out of fear for social position, or social perception of our actions. It would seem then that society shares these common limitations...But where is the origin of such balances in our natures?

In many ways we are given parallels to observe here on earth, and examples to learn expressions of our sincerity, and many of these are shown in scripture, and by these we are then able to discern how we can gauge our faith's integrity.

define your conclusion of correctness in your world view?

Perhaps more pointed, would be the observation that in the pursuit of science, having seen the "things that seem like the product of design" of the universe (as per Dawkins), and all its parts, still the atheist scientist excludes from their reasoning anything that smacks of the metaphysical.

It might be compared to the patron of a restaurant, and suggesting after having eaten what he ordered,

---that the paper and ink the menu presented, had organized itself ideally to produce the meal.

He excludes the idea of

---an author that wrote the menu,

---an owner that built the restaurant,

---and the agent of the author/owner who assembled the meal.

This same patron then defends his observance with vehemence and jeers to all who might consider such things as "an owner/author with a design to feed people from His restaurant," as viable.

How can we allow such singularity of thought and prejudice of reason define our world view?

then how can the atheist claim a total lack of "evidence" for God?

If the Christian maintains evidence by experience, shouldn't the atheist then claim a lack of experience, and not a lack of evidence?

I am repeatedly told by Muslims that the Bible has been changed,

not that they accept any of it now anyways,

---but Mohammed declared "the book" as being given by God to man (the Torah to Moses, the Ingeel to Christians), and that they were the way of truth and light.

This was written into the Quran before 650AD so I am assuming they mean changes since then.

It seems though when I ask where they were changed, by whom, and how much, no one seems to have the time to answer.

Obviously the Dead Sea Scrolls have confirmed the valid scribing of the Old Testament in its entirety, so the Torah, the Writings and the Prophets remain as written in the OT and we have added to the resevoir of uninspired writings as well from that discovery.

Every scrap of the New Testament found (now dating into the eyewitness period with a most recent discovery of parts of "Mark") shows the validity of what has been written in the New Testament.

With very few later scribal insertions found, and clearly noted in the texts of most current translated Bible copies, I fail to see the claim of any alteration unnoticed, or sufficient to change the overall message of the Bible.

I want to hear evidence of these "changes" if you have any.

I'd like to know how much scripture the Muslim faith adheres to.

They accept the Torah, and the gospel, but what of the rest?

The prophets?

The writings?

If you cannot find any, don't be surprised. In all the world there is only a small clue given that tells you what the purpose of an Ostrich is..

10 pts for the right answer.

It would seem the professionals involved are constantly searching for the right approach, but never actually reaching any conclusion... Is it really that big a problem to solve, or they always just barking up the wrong tree?

Carl Woese

(considered a contemporary equivalent to Darwin)

and Gunter Wachterhauser

(1993 received the annual award of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences and the following year he was made an honorary professor at the University of Regensburg //1999 received the Bonn Chemistry Award// 2008 adjunct professor University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) in a joint effort are quoted:

“In one sense the origin of life problem today remains what it was in the time of Darwin -- one of the great unsolved riddles of science. Yet we have made progress. Through theoretical scrutiny and experimental effort since the nineteen-twenties many of the early naive assumptions have fallen or are falling aside -- and there now exist alternative theories. In short, while we do not have a solution, we now have an inkling of the magnitude of the problem.”

Stanley Miller,

(awarded the Oparin Medal by the International Society of the Study of the Origin of Life in 1983// served as its President from 1986 to 1989)

(nominated for Nobel Prize more than once) of the Miller-Urey experiment?

"Origin of life has turned out to be much more difficult than I, and most other people, envisioned."

If the groundbreakers of the advancing theory are still just scratching the