Why does the IWC totally mark out over these wrestlers?

1. Cesaro's a fairly innovative big man wrestler with a lot of talent and an indi pedigree that's going to get the internet fans, along with the casual fans, liking him more so than they'll like a cut-and-dry powerhouse guy like Swagger. I don't think his moves by any means are "Weak." He's got some great uppercut variations, the Neutralizer has it's own unique spin to an otherwise textbook move, and while he isn't king on the mic, the swing has him getting pretty over with the crowd due to the man's amazing equilibrium and strength.

2. Dolph's a bit of a paradox to me as well. He's an average worker with a decent look, but nothing he does really screams anything but midcard to me. He does seem to get over with his workrate, though, so I can't fault a guy getting himself over in the old fashioned Ricky Steamboat way of doing things.

3. I think you're right on all points about the Miz (speaking as a guy who was AT 28. Yikes, what a crud card), and I find that his fandom is short in numbers these days. I'm not a flat out Miz hater, but I go hot and cold on the guy. Well, more like lukewarm and cold, but yeah, the WWE seems to see something in the guy.

4. Again, I think this is another case where the fans agree with you They want to see the WWE do better by Sandow and give him something better to work with other than a hometown crowd heeler. I'm not a huge fan of his workrate in the ring, but the guy oozes charisma, and he's got a style that works well in the WWE. It's nuts that he's getting squandered, and I think most Sandow fans are as frustrated as you seem by his career being pigeonholed.

Everybody has opinions, though. The thing about opinions is that you can disagree with them, but you can't really prove them wrong, because they're not fact. They're opinion. I may not like yours, and you may not like mine, but I actually welcome this refreshing, less-mud-slingey vibe that you're giving off while giving your own take on wrestling.

1. I'm going to steal an old saying by an even older user here, do your homework watch his matches in Ring Of Honor.

2. I ....... do not understand the Dolph Ziggler = Billy Gunn comparison, did anyone actually watch Gunn Wrestle? Dolph Ziggler is absolutely nothing like Billy Gunn, which is a good thing; if Dolph Ziggler wasn't concussion prone he'd be on top. Once again, do your homework.

3. Who in the blue bloody hell gave a damn about The Miz enough to cheer when he was handed the belt so everybody would focus on Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson and John Cena, absolutely nobody you have no proof any actual professional wrestling fan actually liked The Miz and wanted The Miz to win the belt.

4. I don't understand this; how is Damien Sandow's Gimmick holding him back? This is why I don't take Internet Wrestling Community seriously, it's a bunch of armchair bookers who think they know the business and what works and what doesn't better then those living it.

1. Cesaro has the look of a guy that can take on and defeat legit fighters. People that can see potential in wrestlers know that wrestlers like that can be pushed well and draw money for the business if used correctly.

2. Dolph Zigger is actually entertaining, both in the ring and on the mic. He's one of the few wrestlers that could pull that off. I do agree that he is mighty similar to Billy Gunn though, both in in-ring style and appearance. Maybe he should get his own style. Still, many people forget how over Billy Gunn was back in the day, even though he wasn't a superstar.

3. What you call the "IWC" is not the same mind. Wrestling fans on the internet each have different opinions. Not everybody expressed their happiness about The Miz winning the big one. I know I didn't. He didn't seem like the type to even be competing for that title, let alone winning it.

4. It's exactly what you said. You like him, he's a good wrestler, and excellent on the mic. Many wrestling fans, online or not, can see that talent and potential in him. He can easily excel as a wrestler if simply given a better gimmick. That's what wrestling is all about.

ONLY INTERNET MARKS LIKE MIZ, NOT INTERNET SMARKS (THERE'S ACTUALLY A DIFFERENCE)

MY ONLY BEEF WITH ZIGGLER IS HE NEEDS A BETTER FINISHER. WHAT PART OF THE BODY DOES THE ZIGZAG ATTACK ANYWAY?

CESARO HAS BEEN PRAISED TO THE GILLS BY BOTH STONE COLD STEVE AUSTIN, AND JIM ROSS, IF HE'S GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE TEXAS RATTLESNAKE, AND GOOD OLD JR, THEN HE'S DAMN SURE GOOD ENOUGH FOR ME. MY ONLY BEEF IS THAT HE NEEDS TO GET PROPER KNEEPADS AND GET RID OF THE STUPID WRAPS WHICH REALLY DON'T GIVE HIM ANY PROTECTION FROM INJURY AT ALL. PLUS HE DOES NEED A BETTER FINISHER THAN THE SWING, ESPECIALLY SINCE THE SWING IS A BABYFACE MOVE ESSENTIALLY, AND HE'S SUPPOSED TO BE A HEEL

as jerry springer says "who are these people" iwc does not exist.

1. Cesaro is a power wrestler that does everything the correct way. he has all the tools and ability to be the walking billboard for WWE if given the chance.

2. Dolph Ziggler well if he would STOP TRYING TO BE FN BILLY GUNN maybe his career would go somewhere but WWE has cut off his knees so many times its well not worth it anymore.

3. nobody likes the Miz

4. Sandow as the Lanny Poffo character the Genius had legs and could of gone somewhere and Rhodes Scholars could of been a long term tag team champions but WWE had to split the team and feed him to Cena then make him into a comedian and well look at him now. low card shrill for soda and sonics

No long answer needed here, they are all good wrestlers, I'm not going to disrespect any of them or tell you that they suck, because they don't, they play their roles and they do that perfectly, most of iwc is smart enough to think for themselves and know how good these guys are.

If this is matt R. From Philly its your cousin Aidan. So bish do me a favor n make this the best answer