Is the reason Bill O'Reilly is able to get away with his lie is because Cons think the Falklands and the Falkland Islands are two different?

Fox News is expected to lie, the reason why some are not making a big deal out of it.

No, we know the difference between "(the) Falklands (Islands)" and "the Falklands War." You see, O'Reilly said he was in Argentina during the Falklands War. He didn't say that he was in "the Falklands" or "the Falklands Islands." See how that works?

He said he covered the Falkland War. He never said he was on the Falkland Islands. Mother Goose, or whatever that website is called sure has you played for a tool.

Who cares what O'Reilly says? You are only bringing it up because Brian Wilson is a liberal and a proven liar. And this is your babyass way of trying to even the score and its not working.

Get over it! If you watched his program last night and listened to his Boss at NBC at the time, you would understand. Hate on him all you want, but he will still be putting liberals in their place for many years to come!

https://tv.yahoo.com/news/bill-o-reilly-want-stop-...

Why is it every time a liberal is proven to be a liar and corrupt you liberals are more concerned with doing anything they can to finger point at anything else rather than admit one of their little tin gods has feet of clay? If you want credibility then you need to start being honest about the liars in your party instead of desperately automatically attacking any Republican in a vain effort to try to deflect attention.

No. He got away with it because, at that time, he was considered to e above reproach. Now, it's obvious that he had lied throughout his career.

I know where Argentina is. They lost.

wow