Could this help with creationism v evolution?

Is it, however, a testable hypothesis?

Yes. protons, electrons, neutrons and a large amount of morons lol.

What is the very first thing that started everything. Because you evolutionist don't seem to agree on much besides "wallah here we are" over millions and millions of years.

". . . it was and still is the case that, with the exception of Dobzhansky's claim about a new species of fruit fly, the formation of a new species, by any mechanism, has never been observed." 1

1.Jeffrey H. Schwartz, Origins (New York, John Wiley,), p. 300.

Don't whine at me. I'm not the biologist that wrote this. See the work cited and write your own peer reviewed article. The only thing you need is a Ph.D. in biology.

Logically, the origin of nature required supernaturalism since nature can't self-create itself due no reality of nature before the emergence of nature. Creationism deals with supernaturalism.

Lol

Well as a creation scientist, spiritual archaeologist and religious palaeontologist i can assure you that I would consider it very wrong to call other disciplines of science moronic. You see, as an educator I get more out of intensifying ones intellect than I would poo pooing belief.

DANK.

The discovery of the God Particle/ Higgs Besom has swept away the evolutionist argument.

f*ck creationists