cons say they're against gays and trans people because they'll molest children but cons support molesting children so im confused...?

You have every right to be confused. Think about the poor Cons. and how confusing it is for them. They also feel strongly about the sanctity of life but turn their backs on children when they need their protection. Seems like a double standard at play here. Confuses everyone.

I'm a Con.

I've never said I'm against gays and trans people.

I admit I wasn't a fan of gay people marrying, but other than that I have no problem gay or trans people.

Yes, you’re most definitely confused.

Conservatives have no actual values beyond getting into power and paying back their corporate donors through tax cuts. They lie about everything and set the standard for hypocrisy. Yes, Donald Trump says Roy Moore's character is unimportant as long as he votes the right way, but Newt Gingrich attacked Bill Clinton's adultery while having an affair himself. It isn't just Trump; they are all lying, two faced opportunists.

A child molester loses interest with those who reach puberty.

Moore's wife is the same age as those girls he was trolling, and the trolling seemed to stop when he married her.

I'm sorry, I have not seen anyone defending anyone who has been shown to have molested a child. I can see how would be confused, talking points and rhetoric as opposed to facts.

@Foxhole: You're right: He's accused of child molestation, which has no statute of limitations in Alabama so it must be somewhat less trivial than you believe.

EDIT: Dumbass "deplorables" keeps posting that picture of Franken with an adult. Apples and oranges, dumbass.

ive never heard cons say either of that.

and last i checked it was the democrats defending proven sexual predators like Al Franken.

has Al Franken stepped aside yet? has the democrat party denounced him yet? we have the evidence what are you guys waiting for?

1) there's no valid evidence Moore is guilty

2) Moore isn't accused of pedophilia

Yes , you are confused .