Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

What are the pros and cons of a .270 Winchester to a 30-06?

I’ve only used a 270 when I’ve hunted deer, many years ago, it was my fathers, I was 14-16 years old. My dad was great with it, taking deer at 500 yards.

Nowadays, anyone younger than me insists the 30-06 is superior, and doesn’t believe me when I say the 270 is derived from a 30 06 casing. Can anyone tell me where the 270 excels and where it’s inferior to a 30-06?

8 Answers

Relevance
  • Mr.357
    Lv 7
    6 months ago

    For shooting deer, it just doesn't matter.

  • 6 months ago

    The main reason why the .30-06 has so many fankids is that it was a military cartridge. For most hunting, there is little difference between the two. NOTE: The second statement is based upon hunting in thick forests. Open country may require flatter-shooting cartridges.

  • 6 months ago

    My cousin is the big hunter in the family and his favorite is the .270.

    mine is a Steyr 7.62X51 (.308) and could take deer at a bit longer range.

    My dad shoots 30-06 and about the same as mine.

    The thing here is where we hunt, 500 to 600 yards is about all you have to shoot in at best, so given a choice, I would use the .270. It is the lightest of the 3, mine being heaviest with 24 inch barrel and near 9.5 pounds loaded but will outshoot dads 30-06.

    I don't think you could tag any of these as superior. depends on the environment.

    My gun is a tac driver out to 880 yards, 30-06 second, the .270 ???

  • 6 months ago

    Both are fine hunting cartridges.  Have used both however, the 30-06 has more versatility in loading for different sized game.  

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • ?
    Lv 7
    6 months ago

    First he didn’t take deer at 500 yards. The 270 shots flatter. The 30/06 can use 220 gun and is good for all bears 

  • 6 months ago

    I cant add much to what the other guys have said, other than maybe the '06 ammo may be more available. I love my 270 Win, but there have been times when I could '06 ammo and not 270.

  • 6 months ago

    If you compare the two in terms of the amount of energy they have their very close. 30-06 only slightly more and only on some loads. .270 Is faster and has a flatter shooting trajectory. 30-06 you can go with a heavier bullet far larger game. .270 tops out at 150gr where 30-06 tops out at 220gr.

    Everything 30-06 can take so can the .270 Winchester. However if you’re hunting elk, moose, brown or grizzly bear you have to go with a heavier grain. On game like that a 150gr .270 is pushing it. You had to have a damn good shot.

  • Anonymous
    6 months ago

    The .270's strengths are lower recoil and a flatter trajectory.

    The 30-'06 strengths are availability of more and heavier loads for tougher game.

    The .270 is capable of taking down just about anything in North America, but the 30-'06 has more energy at the longer ranges.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.