Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Is Boeing's/ NASA Artemis rocket ever going to leave the ground?
In development now for....10 years...at a cost of 'zillions'...to create a rocket to go the moon? Which we already did with a way better rocket (Saturn V) multiple times Apollo 11-17 (1969-72), and the thing won't even be scheduled to be ready till 2024!
This, when we already have Space-X Falcon Heavy and Dragon 2 capsule to do the same thing and with 'reusable' rockets.
What gives? Is NASA now just a bureaucratic nest of pocket/ career stuffers.
7 Answers
- 1 week ago
The Saturn V was built by several companies - and, Boeing was responsible for the first stage.
The unfortunate thing is, NASA isn’t in charge. Neither is Boeing. It’s Congress. They have started then stopped several programs in the last 20 years, supplying millions for development, only to pull the rug out from under NASA a half dozen times.
One big reason for the long development period for Artemis is the lack urgency that we had when we went to the moon... 4 cents of every dollar spent by the US in the 1960’s were devoted to sending us to the moon; today, that number is much less, with the result being progress is much slower.
Apollo *got* us to the moon - but it wasn’t to stay... I’m hoping Artemis keeps us going with a permanent presence there.
- Anonymous3 weeks ago
Hope not. Just a huge waste of time and money. Nobody cares about the dam Moon and nobody cares about Mars. People who want to show off need to use their own money. Deadbeats.
- 3 weeks ago
There is a lot of justified doubt about the value of sending bozos up to the moon. We already been there. It is dust and rocks ffs. What's the point going back. If we need to do science there, China shows the way with their excellent Chang'e robotic landers which cost about one percent of a humanized flight with all it's overheads.
Source(s): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chang%27e_4 - Ronald 7Lv 73 weeks ago
What you say is true
Nothing will ever come of Horizontal take off and Landing ( HOTOL ),
Boing as a name gives it away
They should stick to what they are good at, making Airplanes
It is like Ford making a car that can go into Space under its own Power
For to get into space requires Earth's Escape Velocity 17, 500 mph
The Saturn 5 Rocket required one Million Pounds of thrust to lift all the Stages and their fuel off the Launchpad and to Orbital Altitude
Now imagine Putting it on its Side and trying that
It would have to fight Gravity as it goes along, even with wings attached
It would never make it
That is why Vertical Launches are the more efficient as with even the Shuttle
The Saturn 5 was the most successful Rocket ever made
Get some people still think you can build a ladder to the Moon !!
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous3 weeks ago
It got stuck in a rock formation. In order to free it, you will have to detonate the rock, which will destroy the rocket. So this is your classic Catch-22.
- CarolOklaLv 73 weeks ago
We used up all the Saturn V rockets. That's outdated technology from a last century. Building those rockets gave people JOBS BEFORE covid 19. Boeing was not the only contractor. Go whine somewhere else. We don't need you. Your critic is NOT constructive.
Is Russia or Iran paying you to spam YA?
https://www.space.com/nasa-sls-megarocket-engine-t...
Where is rage for Grumann and Lockheed? Did Boeing fire you or a family member for incompetence?
- billrussell42Lv 73 weeks ago
I think you got it right, NASA is just a bunch of bureaucrats, unable to do anything useful. But they have to spend their allocations somehow.