ULTRA150

Guy has one for sale motor won't turn, has controls, extra prop, trim for 400.00

Good buy or not, unit looks good.

Khabibullo Abdusamatov, mathematician and astronomer at Pulkovskaya Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences: "Global warming results not from the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, but from an unusually high level of solar radiation and a lengthy - almost throughout the last century - growth in its intensity...Ascribing 'greenhouse' effect properties to the Earth's atmosphere is not scientifically substantiated...Heated greenhouse gases, which become lighter as a result of expansion, ascend to the atmosphere only to give the absorbed heat away."[13][14][15]

Sallie Baliunas, astronomer, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics: "[T]he recent warming trend in the surface temperature record cannot be caused by the increase of human-made greenhouse gases in the air."[16]

Reid Bryson, deceased, former emeritus professor of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison: "It’s absurd. Of course it’s going up. It has gone up since the early 1800s, before the Industrial Revolution, because we’re coming out of the Little Ice Age, not because we’re putting more carbon dioxide into the air."[17]

George V. Chilingar, Professor of Civil and Petroleum Engineering at the University of Southern California: "The authors identify and describe the following global forces of nature driving the Earth’s climate: (1) solar radiation ..., (2) outgassing as a major supplier of gases to the World Ocean and the atmosphere, and, possibly, (3) microbial activities ... . The writers provide quantitative estimates of the scope and extent of their corresponding effects on the Earth’s climate [and] show that the human-induced climatic changes are negligible."[18]

Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, professor, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa: "That portion of the scientific community that attributes climate warming to CO2 relies on the hypothesis that increasing CO2, which is in fact a minor greenhouse gas, triggers a much larger water vapour response to warm the atmosphere. This mechanism has never been tested scientifically beyond the mathematical models that predict extensive warming, and are confounded by the complexity of cloud formation - which has a cooling effect. ... We know that [the sun] was responsible for climate change in the past, and so is clearly going to play the lead role in present and future climate change. And interestingly... solar activity has recently begun a downward cycle."[19]

David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester: "The observed pattern of warming, comparing surface and atmospheric temperature trends, does not show the characteristic fingerprint associated with greenhouse warming. The inescapable conclusion is that the human contribution is not significant and that observed increases in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases make only a negligible contribution to climate warming."[20]

Don Easterbrook, emeritus professor of geology, Western Washington University: "global warming since 1900 could well have happened without any effect of CO2. If the cycles continue as in the past, the current warm cycle should end soon and global temperatures should cool slightly until about 2035"[21]

William M. Gray, Professor Emeritus and head of The Tropical Meteorology Project, Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University: "This small warming is likely a result of the natural alterations in global ocean currents which are driven by ocean salinity variations. Ocean circulation variations are as yet little understood. Human kind has little or nothing to do with the recent temperature changes. We are not that influential."[22] "I am of the opinion that [global warming] is one of the greatest hoaxes ever perpetrated on the American people."[23] "So many people have a vested interest in this global-warming thing—all these big labs and research and stuff. The idea is to frighten the public, to get money to study it more."[24]

William Kininmonth, meteorologist, former Australian delegate to World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology: "There has been a real climate change over the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries that can be attributed to natural phenomena. Natural variability of the climate system has been underestimated by IPCC and has, to now, dominated human influences."[25]

George Kukla, retired Professor of Climatology at Columbia University and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, said in an interview: "What I think is this: Man is responsible for a PART of global warming. MOST of it is still natural."[26]

David Legates, associate professor of geography and director of the Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware: "About half of the warming during the 20th century occurred prior to the 1940s, and natural variability accounts for all or nearly all of the warming."[27]

Marcel Leroux, former Professor of Climatology, Université Jean M

Let's face it the reason most people go to college for is so that they can make more money. So why sould I have to pay more tax dollars just so you can make more money.

From the sell of cattle from your farm

Wouldn't it be nice if all of the money spent on smear campains would be used to put say wind turbines in peoples yards that wanted to have them. How much good do you think that would do for the United States?

Clinton's plan would require businesses to provide insurance for employees, and the wealthy would pay higher taxes to help defray costs for those less able to pay for it. She put the government's cost at $110 billion a year.

How many years has it been sence a winter like this one, Hell it's even cold down here in Texas.

They seem to all say that things are getting better over in Iraq, yet when you watch the news all they can say is how bad we are doing in Iraq. Who should we belive.

I even heard that now with more troops hitting the ground things are starting to settle down in Iraq.

If this is true then is it a mistake to be so quick to pull our troops out now that things are looking better.

What if this buildup really is working?

I hope Bush does not veto this pork barrel poka package that our spineless Congress and Senate have sent foward.

I can't wait to see what will happen whitten a year of our troops leaveing Iraq.I will go out on a limb here and put it down so that we can look back and say wow.

cost of barrel of C oil 150.00$ +

100,000 of Iraq's killed

and we will be hit again within three years but this time it will be much worse.

Here is a man that should be in jail for murder (Chappaquiddick) Mary Joe remember her. and then their was that time at the compound attempted rape and assult ( I think they were trying to get rid of her also) Hey but what the heck he's a good Dem. You guys keep voting him into office year after year. Then you want to beat down a man like Bush.

In Texas the Robinhood school tax system was shot down in cort. Now with that as a precedence in law, can the earned income tax credit be shot down also?

I here all the time that we the people said that we want our troops home but I seem to have not been around for that vote so here is your chance, Stay or come home. YOU MAKE THE CALL!

I came across this while surffing the net

http://www.2la.org/syria/wmd.html

how much is your health care tax or what ever you call it for your free medical system. Just trying to get an idea on what it would cost each of us here in the USA for your kinda program. Also how do you like your health care system?