Why would the U.S Government HIJACK planes and KILL AMERICANS to incite WAR?(here's proof)?

Oh yea, that's playing on all the major investigative news organizations........ NOT .. Conspiracy theory nut!

I love it when every 17 year old with a bong and a computer thinks hes solved the worlds problems before everyone else cause he saw it in wikapedia or somewhere friggin else.

So your thinking that if they would have done it before, they would do it now?

Before everyone thinks that they would never do this, think again. What is a measly 3,000 people to start a war as far as the military is concerned? And lets make this perfectly clear: If the terrorists really wanted to do damage, they would have had waited till around 11: 00 am to hit the Twin Towers to kill many more civilians (as many as 50,000 are around that area at that time. Someone had a conscience. Terrorists do not.

Again, if further proof is needed about these facts for those who think "Our government would never do that!" should go to website prison-planet.com and other sites that indeed have evidence that some of the buildings around the site came down a few hours later with explosives. Any one who knows about demolition know its takes more than a few hours to have the building implode perfectly within itself.

Also see the proof from the people who actually built the Twin Towers, not a bunch of government hacks. Check the video from goggle on this. Very enlightening. These buildings would not have come down period. Also, we should check into the Pentagon crash. Something about a missile? Guess they needed some upgrades anyways.

Oh, I guess we should all check our medications. NOT!

Dream on............... i don't think of we ought to do some thing like blaming different international locations for using the"phony info", blamed on a foreign places united states of america, giving Political and army management the excuse, besides because of the fact the traditional public and worldwide backing, they should launch a conflict. have been given a lot of reason in the back of going over, into conflict devoid of using planes to explode homes, to have an excuse. Clinton? all i can think of of once you talk of bill Clinton is the lust he had for youthful women, and is spouse stayed around for the greed and skill the oral intercourse hubby conversing of on nationwide television, on the stairs of the white domicile so each and everything around the waters can snicker approximately us, having a President that gets on his knees, devoid of shutting the door or sparkling her gown....... i'm ashamed we/our united states of america elected such. not as quickly as, yet two times. I do stay a diverse point.

You are so funny. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and offers people a chance to change the results on the page. It doesn't take facts to do that. If you read it correctly, it is made up of statements by others, not absolute facts. As to the first link, what does the invasion plans of Cuba have to do with hijacking planes? Cuba didn't hijack anything, and nor did America. Your information is totally incorrect. Never trust websites, they might make you think something is true when it isn't. Be careful. Use your brain instead of reading and believing something somebody else typed and made a website to make money on.

your proof is an operation that was CONSIDERED almost 40 years ago?

by a president who is now dead and by an executive committee that is now dead?

you still have not provided one witness to this whole conspiracy.

you show us an operational idea that was made public, and is public record as proof... so the minds who are able to keep at the conspirators silent, pull of the attack in months, create evidence to the contrary, trick millions of people, hide mountains of evidence and have kept is a secret for 6 years were too dumb to not use a plan any one could look up and was 40 years old...

WOW... grasping at straws are we?

It is still NOT proof.

Witness: Proof

Physical evidence that can not be disproved: Proof

Rhetoric on Y! answers: Not Proof

Books and movies by guys who cut out evidence to the contrary: Not Proof.

Please learn the difference.

Loads of people know about this. It is a fact. Sadly, many Americans prefer the head-in-the-sand approach. My own (American) cousin said she just didn't 'want to believe it.' Your sources could be better, though--Wikipedia is never good. Here are some more:

http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/Northwoods.htm...

http://www.retakingamerica.com/northwoods_page_1.h...

Thank god Kennedy saw reason. What would BUSH do in a similar situation??

This is not the first time America has used such tactics--they are common strategies seen also in the Spanish-Cuban-American war (America blew up its own ship for an excuse to get invovled and control Cuba).

Watch 'Loose Change' to find out more about how a similar plan was employed recently......(maybe!)

http://www.loosechange911.com/

In the 1930's similar Krap surfaced saying that in a war with Japan Hawaii would be offered as a sacrificial lamb and the Japanese would then be defeated outside of California, Interesting stuff and as always fiction does imitate life. I just saw an article that Wives cheat are you going home to shoot yours?

Since there were terrorists who were plotting against the US, and the government knew it, why wouldn't they just do the simple thing-- allow the terrorist to hijack a plane or four planes. The administration ignored so many warnings immediately prior to Sep 11, 2001, that that this is an easy and logical inference to make.

Thanks for link to the George Washington University site. It's very informative.

If you truly believe this, your best bet is therapy. In a few sessions of therapy and some medication, you'll find that things seem so much different in the real world!

Whats all the crap about a pretext to go to war .

Just come right out and tell me the truth .