Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
A critique of Western philosophy, circa 1904 - 2007, in the form of a poem. Comments?
Need For Lacuna
No philosophy is sufficiemt
To deal with the problems of the modern
Day: so they, jaded or dazed, would say meant
No philosophy were needed by them
When what, and palpably, were needed were
A summary effort, execution
If you will, of the has-been, and then more
Strenuous, and appropriate, action
Be ta’en in light of modern requirements,
Such as going beyond the mechanics
Of Newton and God to the dynamics
Of Einstein and Man; also, uncertainties
Of Pauli and Heisenberg and a past
Done and gone. But they went wrong: will, at last,
They go right, to Relativity at
Least, which be certainly truthful if not
A TOE, which be not,
As Gödel clearly stated, and Hawkings,
Belatedly, admits is overrated by
Intelligence which overestimated “Why?”
And “How?”, and now underestimates We
Who, all too clearly, be coming to see a need for.
==============================
0: An extended sonnet, from the Shakespearean to
an increasingly uncertain, if not totally irregular, form.
1: TOE – Theory Of Everything. “No such animal exists.”,
as Churchill famously said (I am uncertain it was him).
2: Regarding Gödel’s Theorem, “Gödel, Escher, Bach”
by Douglas Hoffstadter is well-worthy of recommendation.
3: Newton conceived of the Universe as mechanical and
ultimately predictable, a secular teleologistic.
4: Einstein famously said he did not believe God played with
dice. He made no mention of human beings.
5: Of Pauli, Heisenberg and Stephen Hawkings, it is left to the
reader’s initiative to find reference thereto.
3 Answers
- soppy.bollocksLv 41 decade agoFavorite Answer
It's a nice piece of work but it doesn't so much criticise 20th Century Western Philosophy as theoretical physics.
- Gee Whizdom™Lv 51 decade ago
Excellent piece!
Although there are elements that I don't entirely agree with, It makes a coherent point, and is well stated.