Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

What do you think of this "women only" please.....?

I was talking to a friend about the different wars and so on.

I told him that if we women got into the war game they would learn afew things from us. We can plan better and we can even think more evil then them. But on the other hand we know we would have to clean up the mess - like after every war they start. But as we can feel and see the future we know all wars add up to nothing.

He said that he got nervouse - must have been me voice - and that he believes me, that women could take over and run over them .

Should I have better not said anything or do you think they can handle the truth.

We could take them out!!!!!

Update:

nicola, I guess you were right - look at the first gormless guy. He did not get it..

Maybe its time.....

8 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    I bet you 10 to 1 all men who read this are not going to get it.

    Yes if we got together we would take them out. That's why most cultures and religions keep women down - not with logic but with brutal force. If women were just as muscular and aggressive as men - they would loose big time.

  • 1 decade ago

    Yeah you're right. I don't understand what you're saying and I did fall into this trap, but you know you shouldn't take respect as a sign of weakness. Even the most intelligent could not handle a beast :)

    But we don't need any gender wars. I don't need some guy or woman killing my mother or father. Gender wouldn't be an issue then

  • 1 decade ago

    Since women bring children into the world with much pain, and work hard to bring them to adulthood, I think they would be far less likely to then waste those precious lives on unimportant wars. Women would be more stingy with the lives of others. Women would compromise more and save lives. Women would fight like demons to preserve their homes and countries, but not try to control the other countries of the world through brute force.

    True change never comes at the edge of a sword. It comes from a meeting of the minds.

    As for women in battle, I am reminded of Joan of Arc, who was twice injured in hand to hand battle and was twice shot through with an arrow. Once, at the Battle for the Tourelle, at Orleans, she ripped out an arrow herself, that sunk six inches into her body, and rallied her troops and returned to battle the same day, winning the Tourelle for the French.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I'm sorry, but if you put women only on something, expect me to barge in!

    Women have been warriors for eons. Yes, military strategists as well. What about that Boudica lady in Britain? Didn't she plan the rout of the Romans? Sure, more men have thrown themselves away in battle than women. But why would anyone want to?

    You need to do more reading. And please, don't try to "take" us "out." That's just unnecessary.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    If we are all considered equal like I think we are then the military should go totally coed. When that happens I'll reup and follow a woman into the trenches anyday.

  • 1 decade ago

    1st: Women don't plan better, Military strategists plan better. If you think you would do a better job, go study at college.

    2nd: Women don't think more evil.. they think exactly the same in these kind of situations, and even if they did, it wouldn't matter because wars are not about the way of killing more gruesomely, but about getting the higher ground and perpetuating your interests.

    3rd: Nobody cleans up the mess after a war: look at minefields in Vietnam, or in Korea. They still kill people, particullary children.

    5th: men are in average better soldiers... Not because they are smarter or better, but because female soldier standards are watered down in strengh.

    4th: The whole war thing is pointless and dumb, so it really doesn't matter who's better at war, as long as everyone works to end it.

    In My ideal world, Wars would be settled by a rugby match... I'ts baddass and my contry would be much more powerful.

  • 1 decade ago

    Sometimes woman are too emotional, and it may change their decisions. An equal split between man and woman would be a better idea.

  • 1 decade ago

    That would never happen.

    I'll believe it when I see it.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.