It's better to have loved and lost then to never have loved at all??

Let's just say, ALL OF US ARE GOING TO DIE. What's important is how we lieved our lives when we are still alive. You may have lost your boyfried but if you have not met him, would you feel the same happiness everytime you think of the moments that you have shared with him? absoulutely, NO. You may have llst him, but at the end of the day, its not the number of hours that you have spent with each other, but the love that untarnished through time and physically separated by death is important. Though the pain of losing him still haunts you, just believe on this, "YOU WILL BE WITH HIM, SOON,"

style of like.. is it extra effective to be male or lady. not making plans on having a intercourse replace i will purely answer from one attitude. thus nevertheless, it is secure to declare that those have fallen in love weren't in love previous to that, so i think they have the convenience there while it includes assessment. i could say nevertheless, that if love is to be stated as an average beneficial journey it is extra effective to have experienced it than under no circumstances in any respect.

Agree 100%

If you don't have the love at the present at least for one moment you did.

Yes, I agree. It's always worth doing anything and failing on the assurance that you will learn something and take it with you. Thus is life. Those who don't try don't live.

Oh yeah....always better to take the risk and dance than to never have loved at all. Nothing ventured... nothing learned...all part of life, got to live it!

It only applies to "True Love", a love that never dies, a love that burns eternally, a love that you shared with him.

i disagree. I'll spare ya all the details but nope i dont think its true

i agree completely but it can sometimes become overwhelming when u get ur heartbroken...

depends on what you loved