Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

No matter who wins does anybody else agree with this....?

We should find a why to ensure the president's cabinet, those that have his ear so to speak, are representative of more than just their own party.... Either side extreme left or extreme right can both cause a lot of harm when all they hear is their own party line..... there needs to be balance.

Update:

And yes I know we have no way to ensure it I'm just talking in a dream world

12 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    you might have balance, but will anything get done. We need change. Who ever wins will need to be able to make the change.

  • 1 decade ago

    The president picks his own cabinet so it's impossible. They always pick people from outside the party but the cabinet isn't the top advisory body for the president anyway. They run the departments but the White House staff advises the president more on the day to day stuff.

  • Polish
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    That sounds like a good idea, but it is not the way the system works. You elect a Party when you vote for a President. You vote for what that party stands for. The President decides who will be on his cabinet and carry on the ideals of the party. To get an independant cabinet, you need to elect an independant President. Be careful who you vote for. You might get more than you bargained for.

  • The President - whoever he is - has to choose people who are honest & capable and who can work with him and the fellow members of the cabinet as a team. Why can't they all be from the same party? 'Balance' is the correct decsion and action over the different issues, not balancing two different party lines.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • 1 decade ago

    Yes, it would be better if there was balance, but the president gets to pick their cabinet so they do tend to pick from their own political party, and we have no say in who the president picks.

  • 1 decade ago

    In a dream world the two party system we have would provide just that balance it was supposedly designed to provide. Never works, never has. Government wastes more time trying to overbalance than doing their one time real job. Protect us the people as well as represent. Too broke and full of itself to fix.

  • 1 decade ago

    YES, I agree with you 100% You really need to hear both sides of a view point and contemplate them both before you make any decisions that will affect millions of people. I hope that whoever does get into office, goes in with a spirit of cooperation and will do the best they can for our country!

  • peachy
    Lv 6
    1 decade ago

    A good president will create balance. There comes a time in our adult lives when we have to be responsible and make our own decisions. America needs to get back to having a moral conscious in both it's elected officials and citizenry.

  • ?
    Lv 4
    1 decade ago

    you are sounding confuse like old man McCain , it don't matter how long our troops stay in Iraq . well let me disagree with you it dose matter who win because you have a old out of touch warmonger who is looking very confuse with all the gaffes he have made since the general election process started . McCain want to run on a third term for the Bush administration who have just sit and watch this country economy tank with home foreclosures a all time high , $4.00 gas prices at the pump , lost of American jobs do to the tax breaks the Bush administration give to corporations to out source American job etc etc . so i

  • 1 decade ago

    I agree. A little advice from both sides would help.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.