Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Why is the redistribution of wealth that would benefit 95% of American accused of being "socialist?"?

When the redistribution of wealth that has taking place over the last 20 years, but especially over the last 8 years and has benefited the top 5% of Americans at the detriment of the other 95% (and specially the middle class) is praised by Republican as healthy capitalism???

Where is the fairness?

Update:

All the current answers demonstrate that you are confusing socialism and communism. Ever heard of a social democracy?????

And redistribution of wealth based on lowering taxes for 95% of people, and increasing it for 5% of the people wouldn't make any poor people, just slightly less rich! The top 5% of the people would still own 40% of the wealth!!!

10 Answers

Relevance
  • Favorite Answer

    Because Socialism is a scary word to MANY americans because they really have no conception of what it is .... and so .... the republicans .. .as per usual... are playing on the fears of ignorant citizens....

    Now .. I'd like to make a suggestion to those intelligent YET UNSURE voters who are NOT sure re socialism...

    do yourself a favour and do a little bit of INDEPENDENT research .. check out how Australia operates.. ( for example ).. now we're not perfect but we have safety nets to catch those who are unable to afford private health insurrance... IF YOU WANT PRIVATE health insurrance .. it is available ...

    But PLEASE open your minds and try and find UNBIASED definitions of socialism ( by unbiased I mean NOT written by Anti-socialists or pro-socialists but rather somebody with a TOTALLY open mind)

    I challenged you .. in the last days of the campaign to actually LEARN something for yourselves

  • 1 decade ago

    "Why is the redistribution of wealth that would benefit 95% of American accused of being "socialist?"?"

    Because redistribution of wealth is a big chunk of what socialists stand for. DO YOUR RESEARCH.

    "When the redistribution of wealth that has taking place over the last 20 years, but especially over the last 8 years and has benefited the top 5% of Americans at the detriment of the other 95% (and specially the middle class)"

    Absolutely, 100%, incorrect. I'm middle class, and my family has seen quite a bit of the Bush tax cuts. Where are you even getting these ridiculous figures?

    "Where is the fairness?"

    You get what you earn, not what you think you're entitled to.

  • 1 decade ago

    It isn't "considered" socialism. It _IS_ socialism.

    Making people poorer to try and make people "richer" doesn't solve the problem of poverty. All it does is redistribute the poverty.

    The only way to eliminate poverty is through education, not handing out freebees.

    In truth, all the democrats want to do is create a permanent underclass who is forever reliant upon the government so the democrats can always remain in power.

  • 1 decade ago

    Obama is going to raise taxes on everyone. The difference is, the people who are wealthier will not be able to deduct as much and will pay a higher percentage of taxes. McCain would rather continue our Reaganomics policy and keep his chronies in control.

    Source(s): How can you plan for the future if you're not gonna be in it? - Chris Rock
  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • ?
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    take from their rich give to the people don't wanna work and while live off government middle class will not see any,a tax increase instead some ways to pay for .

  • 1 decade ago

    Do you smoke? Drink? Have credit card debt? Spend frivolously? Have satellite TV? Kids have Wii's? You have a Wii? Car you could not afford? House you could not afford? Get manicures and pedicures? Buy yourself nice cloths? Kids nice cloths? Do you do drugs? Do you have a cell phone? Two? You obviously have a computer and internet. Were (are) they free? Do you take vacations you can not afford?

    Basically.....When are people going to stop playing the victim and take some responsibility for themselves and the holes they dig?

    FYI** We already have food stamps, child care allowances, medicare, medicaid, full assistance programs, job training programs, unemployment programs, prescription programs, fuel assistance programs, WIC, lunch programs, disability programs, etc...........what more do our "poor" need.

  • 1 decade ago

    what this means is basically this, some will have some wont. what it boils down to, they tried this in the Soviet Union, it didnt work! your not seeing the real picture, if you are nieve enough to think Obama is really gonna help the poor you are sadly mistaken! hes a hollywood snob now, Obama is only out to help himself and the idiots that have put him there!

  • 1 decade ago

    You're being ridiculous. You should know that the Bush gave everyone breaks... Besides, you should be understanding you live in a country that doesn't tolerate govt interference. If you like socialism, you should move to Canada and join me.

  • T S
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    You have no idea what you are talking about.

    Read my link for an idea of what "redistribution" leads too.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    If you think that the middle class will be protected from tax increases by Obama, you are really naive!

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.