Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
How do Christians reconcile this, when even Jesus believed it? Here is my short version...?
Ancient, as well as modern Jews understand that the prophet Elijah will return at a later time to announce the coming of the messiah. Until Elijah comes first, no man claiming to be the messiah can be truthful. This Jewish belief that Elijah must come first is rooted in two sections of the Old Testament.
1: Kings 2:8 Elijah is taken into heaven by a chariot of fire.
2: Malachi 4:5-6 :Behold, I will send you Elijah the prophet before the great and terrible day of the Lord comes. And he will turn the hearts of fathers to their children and the hearts of children to their fathers, lest I come and smite the land with a curse.
The Malachi passage is understood traditionally by Jews that Elijah will return to the earth to act as the forerunner to the messiah and therefore must precede him.
Even Jesus firmly believed that Elijah, the true messianic forerunner, must come first before the true messiah can arrive. This is validated in the following passage:
His disciples asked him, saying, Why then say the Scribes that Elijah must first come? And Jesus answered and said unto them, Elijah SHALL FIRST COME and restore all things. But I say unto you that Elijah is come already, and they knew him not, but have done unto him whatsoever they listed. Likewise shall also the Son of man suffer of them. Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist. Matt. 17:10-14
Jesus crudely attempts to pass off John the Baptist as Elijah to help the validity of his own messianic claims. Yet, here we have a contradiction in the passage John 1:21, when the Jewish authorities question John the Baptist directly to see if he his indeed Elijah or even a prophet. Elijah is both! What is John? Neither.
They asked him, "Then who are you? Are you Elijah?"
He said, "I am not."
"Are you the Prophet?"
He answered, "No." John. 1:21
The Old Testament sets the “Messiah standard” and gives no hint that Elijah will be reincarnated (as this is not a Christian nor Jewish belief), gives no hint that Elijah will send a representative, or even send his spirit to act in someone else’s body. Elijah was taken into heaven still alive for a reason. In Matt 17:10, Jesus implies John is Elijah, yet John says directly, and beyond any method of interpretation, that he is NOT Elijah.
The coming of the messiah is a chain of events, and if one link in a chain is broken, the entire thing does not work. John the Baptist does not qualify as Elijah, therefore this invalidates Jesus as the true messiah. This broken link displays among other things that shows Jesus’s lack of validity.
I’m definitely agnostic at heart, and atheist towards all supernatural gods put fourth by man, but this is kind of important to me in the whole "validity of Christianity" argument, because it proves beyond the shadow of a doubt, and by using their own ******* book, that their first century sorcerer who infested a shitload of pigs with devils and made them run into the sea 30 miles from their location can honestly be taken serious.
Matt 17:10 shows even Jesus believed Elijah has to come first, so there is no interpreting your way out of this one for any Christian who decides to argue that which can’t be argued fruitfully.
Find me a passage in the Old Testament that shows 1: Elijah will come in spirit and power, and not his literal self as any Hebrew would see it. 2: Elijah will send his ministry before the coming, not himself! Oh my.
There is no way you can validate claims 1 or 2 using lines from the old testament.
further more to all your questions, then what about when you’re using passages in the new testament to validate the claims made by the new testament...this isn’t a logical move on your part.
“And he will go on before the Lord, in the spirit and power of Elijah…”
There is no “spirit and power of Elijah”, because every single Jew throughout history understands that the literal Elijah, the very same heap of flesh that was taken up in Kings, will be the very same heap that returns and prepares for the messiah’s arrival.
The Old Testament in any way shape or form does not mention any sort of “spirit and power of Elijah”. In the story he was literally taken up with the intention of being returned. I’m sorry, but the passage in Kings is not open for interpretation, because literal means literal. It doesn’t say “the spirit and power of Elijah” was taken up, now does it? No!
If John were truly Elijah, he would know…give god a little more credit than that! The old testament does not validate the claim that it is Elijah’s ministry who will return to prepare for the messiah either! The Jews, the people who SET THE STANDARD in this whole debate, are waiting for a literal skin and bones Elijah.
The only thing Jesus is going is making claims for himself, and clearly not living up to the old testament standard. He crudely attempts to pass off John the Baptist as Elijah, the Jews are not fooled, and even John admits he is not Elijah.
It comes down to this: the Hebrew writers of the Old Testament jotted down the standard to be met. Jesus does not meet that standard. If he did then we’d all be Jews, and there would be no John the Baptist.
You are interpreting my friend. Take the text as literal history, and talk to a Jew, and you will get exactly what I’m saying.
You say my claim evaporates, yet you’re trying to evaporate an entire ocean with a mere flashlight!
Your downfall, first and foremost, is the fact that you even dared to quote Luke 1: 13-17. This a New Testament claim. The New Testament does not prove the New Testament!
Show me a line in the Old Testament where God speaks to the angel, the very same angel that Luke speaks of in 13-17, and validates this claim, a legitimate foreshadowing of things to come. "Yo, Angel from Luke! Here’s what will happen! Here is the prophecy to come."
Show me a line in the Old Testament where God, or some representative of the celestial hierarchy, says something along the lines of "Elijah himself won’t be coming back, but someone like him will. His name will be John.
10 Answers
- Anonymous1 decade agoFavorite Answer
in any case, please allow me to clear-up your misunderstanding on this issue. Below are the two passages of the gospels that you cite:
But I tell you, Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but have done to him everything they wished. In the same way the Son of Man is going to suffer at their hands." Then the disciples understood that he was talking to them about John the Baptist. (Matthew 17:12,13)
Now this was John's testimony when the Jews of Jerusalem sent priests and Levites to ask him who he was. He did not fail to confess, but confessed freely, "I am not the Christ." They asked him, "Then who are you? Are you Elijah?" He said, "I am not." "Are you the Prophet?" He answered, "No." Finally they said, "Who are you? Give us an answer to take back to those who sent us. What do you say about yourself?" John replied in the words of Isaiah the prophet, "I am the voice of one calling in the desert, 'Make straight the way for the Lord.'" (John 1:19-23)
Your claim is that because Jesus said that John the Baptist was Elijah and John disavowed this claim, that the Bible is contradictory and thus: "Game over Christianity!!!" Okay, this is actually very easy to explain and understand. Was John the Baptist Elijah or not? The answer is no... and yes. If we look at this third Gospel passage, this apparent difficulty evaporates:
But the angel said to him: "Do not be afraid, Zechariah; your prayer has been heard. Your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you are to give him the name John. He will be a joy and delight to you, and many will rejoice because of his birth, for he will be great in the sight of the Lord. He is never to take wine or other fermented drink, and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even from birth. Many of the people of Israel will he bring back to the Lord their God. And he will go on before the Lord, in the spirit and power of Elijah, to turn the hearts of the fathers to their children and the disobedient to the wisdom of the righteous—to make ready a people prepared for the Lord." (Luke 1:13-17)
From this passage we see a few things.
One, John was born through Elizabeth, a relative of Jesus' mother Mary. Thus, unless you believe in the concept of reincarnation, John could not have literally been Elijah. The man Elijah had already been born many hundreds of years prior. And he is still alive, as he was taken directly up to heaven alive in a chariot of fire according to the Scriptures (2 Kings 2). He will come again before Jesus' Second Coming (Malachi 4).
The second thing we see is the prophecy of the angel: "He will go on before the Lord, in the spirit and power of Elijah". Jesus (who was John's cousin), knew that John would have a ministry that would function in the spirit of Elijah. But John was not literally Elijah. The ministry of the real Elijah is understood as returning to the earth just prior to the return of Jesus the Messiah and prepare the people of Israel to receive Him. John the Baptist's ministry was a foreshadowing of Elijah's ministry in that he prepared the people of Israel to receive the first coming of their Messiah. Do you understand now? When Jesus said to his disciples that Elijah had already come, he was speaking figuratively, not literally. Again, Jesus knew that John was his cousin, born by Elizabeth. And as a Jew who believed the Old Testament, obviously Jesus did not believe in, nor teach reincarnation. This is simple common sense.
But there is another very important message that Jesus was conveying here that must not be missed! When Jesus referred to John as Elijah, He was not simply making a point about who John was, but rather Jesus was pointing to who HE was! For anyone who knew that prophecies about Elijah, Jesus was clearly making the point that He was Yahweh - God Almighty. When we examine what the prophetic passages say, this becomes obvious.
"See, I will send my messenger, who will prepare the way before me. Then suddenly the Lord you are seeking will come to His temple; the messenger of the covenant, whom you desire, will come," says the LORD Almighty... "See, I will send you the prophet Elijah before that great and dreadful day of the LORD comes. He will turn the hearts of the fathers to their children, and the hearts of the children to their fathers. But who can endure the day of His coming? Who can stand when He appears? For he will be like a refiner's fire or a launderer's soap. He will sit as a refiner and purifier of silver... So I will come near to you for judgment." (Malachi 3:1, 4:5)
So Elijah would come before "the Day of the LORD - The Day of Yahweh". And in this day, the LORD HIMSELF would come to HIS Temple. Whose Temple does it say it is? God's Temple. Jesus came the first time and went into the Temple and purged it. When He comes the second time, He will do the same - although in a far more complete way. This time, no one will doubt that Jesus will come as God Himself and He will judge among
- 1 decade ago
In Malachi 4 the scriptures refer to Israel. It talks about the great and terrible day of the Lord. Now this day was not when Jesus Christ was born in a manger, nor before he died on the cross. This day is spoken of in the Book of Revelations. This day is what Christians call the Second Coming.
As a group, Israel denied Christ. In their point of view the messiah has not come to them yet. The hearts of the children have not been turned to their fathers yet. The hearts of the fathers have not been turned to their children yet. Now you ask has Elijah came? Sure, the same spirit as Elijah's came in John the Baptiste. However, is Elijah to come literally again? Remember the transfiguration when the disciples saw Moses and Elijah with Jesuss? Afterwards the disciples began to ask questions about Elijah. Jesus said:
Matthew 17
11Jesus replied, "To be sure, Elijah comes and will restore all things. 12But I tell you, Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but have done to him everything they wished. In the same way the Son of Man is going to suffer at their hands."
Jesus says that Elijah is still coming, and that he has already came (John the Baptist). Now where will Elijah come again. Go to Revelations 11. Could it be that Moses and Elijah are the two witnesses. Revelations 11:6 says
6These men have power to shut up the sky so that it will not rain during the time they are prophesying; and they have power to turn the waters into blood and to strike the earth with every kind of plague as often as they want.
Doesn't that sound like Moses and Elijah again? Read Revelations 11, and I hope it helps to answer your question.
Consider in Revelations 144,000 Israelites become evangelists for
Christ and then we have Moses and Elijah appearing again, and then Christ's Second Coming during the climax of the Battle of Armageddon. Would not all that be quite an outreach to Israel?
- Juice002Lv 61 decade ago
Fellow, you seems to know the answer you will except before asking.
In Matt. 17: Yahshua / Jesus caused both Moses and Elijah to appear with him.
They were both dead men as you know death to be, but they were there with him in the Mount alive.
Moses came before Joshua / Yahshua of old time to prepare the way and turn their hearts to Yahweh / God or Jehovah.
So in those times: Moses was in the spirit of Elijah by principle.
Then you have Elijah and Elisha ( Elisha means: Yahshua ) Thus Elijah then was before Elisha or by principle: Yahshua.
Thus John was born full of the holy spirit as was Moses, as was Elijah, therefore, it's the SAME spirit in all of the men with same purpose.
Moses at the Red Sea to the Jordan, Elijah at the Jordan and John at the Jordan.
The reason, John / Elijah could not say plainly that he was Elijah or even the Messiah that he was the Messiah is because: The Prophets foretold that Israel would NOT! know the day of their visitation.
Thus they answered in a dark saying : " I am a voice crying in the wilderness " If that had been understood, they would have known he was Elijah.
Are you the Messiah ? " Even as I told you and you understood me not: The works I do bare record of me that the father sent me " If that was understood by them who asked,( He preached to the poor, raised the dead, gave sight to the blind, all the things Messiah would do ) If they had known he was the Messiah; They would not have killed him, a thing they must do.
He Built the the 3rd. Temple and lead his disciples victoriously in battles. ( but the battles was against the very people to know him and did not ( Messiah put them to silence, by the great words he spoke, the sword of his mouth ) a spiritual battle, thus they missed him again.
While they look for some physical Temple, Messiah's Temple was the body of believers who it was given to believe on him.
His kingdom was a Spiritual everlasting kingdom set up in Jerusalem ABOVE and not physical Kingdom on the earth.
Everything they looked for, they were blinded not being able to look to the end of what was spoken, blinded by the flesh seeing only physical things even unto this very day.
Thus, they missed Elijah, they have also missed the Messiah, and Christian have it wrong too.
Juce
- 1 decade ago
I think you missed one of the things Jesus said about "Elijah" when coming down the Mount of Transfiguration (probably Mt Tabor in Galilee). He indicated that John was actually the "Elijah" to come, but wouldn't be accepted just as the prophecies said. Also you missed what was said about John the Baptist in Luke 1 by an angel prior to birth and his father, under inspiration, after John's birth. They hook into the Old Testament prophecies clearly.
I think John the Baptist was a somewhat modest individual. He did not necessarily know all of the prophecies applied to himself, and so didn't trumpet his status. He may have thought of Elijah's miracles and thought himself somewhat less elevated, although his persecution by Herod's wife was very like that of Elijah and Jezebel in many features. The prophecy that he did recognise about the 'forerunner of the Lord' (Isaiah 40) was not one the Jewish law experts of the time seem to have been aware of.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I hold out the belief that many things could have been "back-written" into the New Testament. Many allusions to reincarnation were censored. The letter of the Word lost all meaning when the message changed languages, so loosen up some.
Say (for the sake of friendly disagreement) that Jesus was NOT Jesus "Christ." Does that in any way change the beauty of what he said and did? Not in my book. Why must he be evil if Christians are mistaken? The Truth is bigger than our minds can embrace.
- ?Lv 71 decade ago
Mat 17:13 Then the disciples understood that he spake unto them of John the Baptist.
- DgnosticLv 51 decade ago
You are correct. But remember the denunciation made by John the Baptist was put fourth by a Church wishing to deny reincarnation. They compiled the scriptures as they saw fit. They created Christ as they saw fit. They wished to forward their own ideas about a concept of Christ that they felt was correct. You have just noticed one of the many inconsistencies in the works of the Bible. Therefore read the Bible with a grain of salt. You are not willing to accept a prepackaged, prearranged and predetermined concept of God that another wishes to impose on you. I say good for you! God is as you understand him to be. Don't let anyone tell you any different. I do not accept the prepackaged Christ or God of the Proto-gospel set. Why should I accept another's understanding of what is before me?
- Eliaas2Lv 61 decade ago
I believe in your first comment fully, I say also that Christ is not coming at any time soon, because Elijah, or Elias must first come as Christ said or anything prior is an falsehood
Source(s): the Spirit within - Prof FruitcakeLv 61 decade ago
It may be allegorical. John the Baptist's message was the same as Elijah's.
So you do believe Jesus cast out demons. Why would a 'demon' cast out other demons?
- 1 decade ago
JESUS NEVER SAID THAT JOHN BAPTIST WAS ELIJAH, THE DISCIPLES JUST ASSUMED AND INTERPETED THAT FROM WHAT HE WAS SAYING.