Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
Do expectant fathers need support too?
We talk a lot about how expectant mothers in crisis need support... and her partner always seems to be assumed to be part of HER potential support system, rather than someone who also might need support. But why is that?
Isn't he also in crisis? Isn't he also about to become a parent in a way he might not have planned? (And if anything, doesn't he have less choice in the matter, since he has no option to abort?) Does he necessarily have more money, more parenting experience, or more resources?
I mean, yeah, there comes a point where a pregnant woman is no longer able to work, and at that point she'll need financial support that her partner not carrying the pregnancy won't. That makes perfect sense. But most women aren't totally incapacitated for nine months. Most women with jobs don't have the option to take nine full months off work. So I'm not seeing how that's the make or break for him being a supporter for the entire pregnancy.
(I realize that in years previous, including the BSE, women didn't have the opportunity to work and seek jobs freely. I'm not intending to debate that. I'm talking entirely about the present, when being a female won't keep a woman entirely out of the workforce.)
The woman also has hormonal stuff going on. But is her crisis entirely hormonal? And aren't pregnant women generally considered mentally competent in other areas of life? I don't really see that as sufficient argument either.
I'm thinking less about money, than about emotional support and encouragement-- though he might also need financial support if they're in the same financial boat. But I mean mainly being encouraged to parent. Being told he could be a good father. Being told that it's important to be active in his child's life, not that he's the disposable parent or just a vending machine for child support payments. Being told that his actions matter too, and not just in regards to the mother but for his baby.
It seems like in most talk of family preservation, if a father walks away, he's considered a deadbeat, but if a mother walks away, it's assumed that lack of support meant she didn't have the opportunity to parent her child. Why the double standard?
If both parents bear equal responsibility for the child, why is one parent the supported and one the supporter?
If men received more support (still thinking more emotional than financial,) and had their parenting role taken more seriously, do you think more of them might step up?
JW-- I think you missed the point. Obviously, men can't carry a pregnancy. But they are 50% of a conception, and are also a parent to the child, whether they are highly involved or have to be hunted down for child support payments. Children don't come into the world with only mothers.
You don't have to agree with me, if you can actually provide a reason that the man's need or level of deserving is lesser. But if you're just assuming he doesn't matter because he isn't pregnant... well, you're doing exactly the kind of thinking I was calling into question.
I should add, obviously while a woman is pregnant, her housing, nutrition, and medical care also affect the baby. So I do see financial support necessary from that angle being applied only to her... maybe.
But shouldn't we be concerned about ANY person who lacks shelter, food, or the ability to access healthcare? Should that even be about pregnancy in the first place? Because I see it as a more general humanitarian concern, not something that only activates our notice when egg meets sperm.
I'm not saying that I think mothers and fathers should always be given an exactly equal amount of physical or financial support, because they do have different needs, especially if they aren't a single household. Just that even if we aren't just talking emotional support, I don't understand why one partner would be disregarded.
Walter, I'm not sure I disagree with you, but I am slightly puzzled.
"I think guys should be getting support from their family if they are trying to be responsible and raise their child."
Do you feel a mother should have to demonstrate some kind of intent before SHE is offered support? If she expresses an intention toward adoption rather than raising the child, is that the point where we cut her off too?
If not, why would we do that to the father?
I'm not suggesting that men should not be held responsible-- just that what you're suggesting still seems to hold them MORE responsible than women. (A mother is offered support just for being a mother; a father has to prove something.)
I agree if you're making a distinction between an offer of support and money actually being passed to him. But if you're saying there shouldn't even be an offer till he has already stepped up... that seems to reinforce the cycle rather than helping the man to see a way to do better for his child.
12 Answers
- LinnyLv 61 decade agoFavorite Answer
Absolutely. In addition to the support you mentioned, they also need accurate legal advice. They have the right to keep their child if the first Mom does not want to. Too many times, fathers find out AFTER the child has been selfishly (and illegally) surrendered to adoption. What if a father tried to do that? Could you even imagine the outrage if a first father tried to give a child away to adoption without the first Mother's knowledge? Double standard, indeed.
Source(s): being adopted and involved in adoption reform - gypsywinterLv 51 decade ago
Probably the glaring answer here would be....How many expectant fathers (in crisis/unplanned pregnancy of his GF/considering adoption) needing support with their impending fatherhood, are asking questions here on YA Adoption?? The amount of expectant fathers (in crisis) posting on YA Adoption, is minisicule, if you want to use YA as a random sample. One can only offer support, if one shows an interest in support and/or asks for it or is identified.
Absolutely, expectant fathers should be involved with the impending birth of their progeny, but sadly, much like yesterday...many expectant fathers still run for the hills when they are told they are about to become a father. Not too mention the *birthmothers* who callously decide not to tell the father that they are indeed pregnant and carrying his child, when any type of abuse is not even in the equation/absent. Also most of your adoption agencies would like the *birthfathers* to completely disappear, as they are seen as a 'fly in the ointment', thus not offering any "emotional" support to the expectant father, other than the "support" that their child will be better off with stranger people. And the "double standard" is that the mother is always way more responsible for "getting herself pregnant", to seek whatever support she can get on her own (whether that be emotional or financial), thru public assistance or the courts, whether yesterday or today.
And not all pregnant women can work the entire time of their pregnancy..depends on what type of job they have and also due to any medical pregnancy crisises that can many times occur. Pregnant women not only have need of emotional & financial support during their pregnancies, but physical as well....the physical part being an area of pregnancy that a man will never be able to experience. Pregnancy is not an *equal opportunity* condition, wherein the man can have all the same problems with a pregnancy as a woman...pregnancy is not a *Unisex* endeavor...never was, never will be.
Men as a whole need to be made very aware that every act of sexual intercourse can result in procreation and they need to step up to the plate as much as any pregnant woman/mother needs to do as well. These are lessons that need to be taught to our male children from a very early age...and not just when a 'crisis pregnancy' unfolds. Bottom-line..yes Family Preservation needs to involve the fathers as well as the mothers, on all levels...so long as you can still locate *daddy*, or identify him.
Source(s): My own thoughts, my own experience... of being pregnant 4 times and working thru 3 of the pregnancies...unmarried and married. - PretentiaLv 41 decade ago
I think a lot of the issues regarding men not receiving support for pending father-hood and women being made to take more responsibility by society for child-rearing/contraception/etc are linked. From childhood there is a role segregation. Girls play mom. Boys play soldier. Men are held to the provider role - in the media the ideal dad is the good provider who dispenses advice at opportune times. Boys are supposed to seek sex and be afraid of commitment and babies. Men are expected to pay the cash and let the mother's make the choices (just look at how acceptable people seem to find it to lie on the birth certificate about the father's id). They are treated like sperm donors whose worth is measured in how on time they provide for their families. Is this fair? No. I would love to see more support groups for expectant fathers. Free parenting classes offered for young men. It might cause more of a turn around then people think, if men were taught that it was manly to be involved with their children, and if they were offered the promise of a deep lasting bond with their children instead of just a monthly bill and whatever access the mother wants to give. I know a lot of people don't think its so unfair, but I would like to see a father try saying that since the mother had sex with some other guy she couldn't see her child anymore. It wouldn't fly, but women do it to men all the time. If men were expected to take an actual role in their childrens life, and they were raised to expect it, then I think more men would take more of an interest in contraception, and in their babies. Yes, a woman needs a different kind of support, but its not fair to just write off the man in the situation because he isn't going through the physical changes. Its still going to change his life forever. I think giving men more resources and emotional support in addition to changing the conditioning we do in this society would see a huge change in the baby drama dynamic for the better for everyone.
- SLYLv 51 decade ago
I am going to an swer this intentionally without reading any of the answers already posted.
Yes, men who are about to be fathers certainly deserve to have support, from their families, from their spouse or significant other or from society as a whole. Unfortunately, with the goal being to get the baby to market in the most expeditious manner possible, the father's rights are often ignored or circumvented. If the industry doesn't flinch at eploiting a pregnant woman, why woudl their scruples resist overlooking the rights of the father?
However, there are VERY few fathers who are stepping up or making a stink about their rights being dismissed. Most often they are just glad to be off the hook for paying child support or they are not caught paying for someone elses child.
- How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
- Walter Ford IILv 41 decade ago
"We talk a lot about how expectant mothers in crisis need support... and her partner always seems to be assumed to be part of HER potential support system, rather than someone who also might need support. But why is that?"
Norms of society.
Women/girls are held more responsible for the pregnancy/parenting then men.
I think guys should be getting support from their family if they are trying to be responsible and raise their child. Telling a girl to place her child up for Adoption isn't being responsible for the child.
Its escaping reality.
Women (often labeled tramps when the pregnancy is unplanned) are often accused of coercing the guys sperm out of him (trapping him). The guys are (labeled) victims even when it comes to providing child support payments to the Ho's & B*tches.
Some parents are stuck with the 50's mentality that the girls pregnancy is not their sons responsibility because "she" shouldn't have been having sex until marriage or at least 21.
Edit: - "just that what you're suggesting still seems to hold them MORE responsible than women. (A mother is offered support just for being a mother; a father has to prove something.)"
Not More responsible but responsible (in and of itself).
That means from day 1 just like it is for a pregnant girl. She doesn't have the option to wait to get a job & save up....neither should he. I don't think that too much for a girl/woman to ask for.
"It seems like in most talk of family preservation, if a father walks away, he's considered a deadbeat, but if a mother walks away, it's assumed that lack of support meant she didn't have the opportunity to parent her child. Why the double standard?"
Very few women "walk away" from their children.
Can you really say the same about men.
Who are the one's struggling emotionally and financially and are filing for welfare for their kids because the spouse has abandoned the family?
There is no double standard.
Source(s): A bigger problem is that Parents are FAILING to raise their sons to Respect girls in general. - CPLv 41 decade ago
I love your question!!
Family preservation should not be just about the mother -child relationship but the entire family -- mother, father, siblings, and even extended family.
I do believe that if more expectant fathers were given support (especially emotional), they could and would take on the responsibility of parenting. To often I see on this site telling expectant mothers to sue the father for child support to help them, instead of assuming he is a deadbeat why not ask the question, what if he just needs the same support encouraging him to parent? To me that is a huge double standard.
- DylanLv 41 decade ago
Exactly! and i hate how women say men are mean or @ssholes or whatever im not 1 but i knows some guys that are.. half the guys arent even like that..
So anyways lol yes it is good to have support for the mother and the father..
- Anonymous1 decade ago
Both parents should support