Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Trending News
What is the meaning of "natural"?
That is, the answers to many questions contain the phrase that something is "natural". Yet, the "nature" of something is what it is, what is observed. The nature of lead is to be dense. The nature of fire is to be hot. This perception is descriptive, but not explanatory. Thus, to say that something is "natural" is neither explanation nor truly responsive.
What, then, is the source of "Nature" in any sense that it serves as explanation, or the answer to any question?
Most questions are either "What?" or "Why?", and to state that it is the "nature" of something or it is "natural" is no greater than to respond to the question "What is a pig" by stating that "A pig is a pig".
That is, in what philosophical sense is "natural" a valid response to any inquiry, what makes anything "natural", and how could any thing be "unnatural" if the concept merely describes the nature of the thing considered, as something considered "unnatural" has a nature?
Thus, what distinguishes "natural" as a reality sufficient for it to be a response to any inquiry?
I really don't expect many reading this to even comprehend the question. It's only natural.
Nice try, Keith, and I sincerely appreciate your candor.
To explain, I offer:
"Sex between same gender partners is not natural, as it does not lead to procreation, and must be considered wrong. Not to mention, the parts don't fit togther".
"Everything in the universe attracts everything in the universe. This is "gravity". Gravity is natural."
Evolution is explained as "natural', with no justification of the force or meaning or providence of "nature". Thus, we have "Natural selection".
In that phrase is a description of anticipated events assumed by the description, with no explanation of the "why" of nature.
Thus, my question.
What, truly, is the source of natural?
4 Answers
- 1 decade agoFavorite Answer
well, if you look at it in another sense the word "nature" can mean what is supposed to be observed as opposed to what is. therefore "natural" can mean things as they should be, or when least exposed to by outside variables
- 1 decade ago
I enjoy your wit, good sir or madam.
what is determined as 'natural' or 'unnatural' is based entirely on ones perception of life, as in, what one has experienced, or what one has been taught.
as of thus, nothing is truly 'natural' or 'unnatural', as this are merely describing words, as you have, more or less, realized and stated in your question.
hum... it seems I don't entirely understand your question. I apologize, and hope that my attempt at least offers some insight to finding your answer.
I understand what you mean with the example, " 'what is a pig' 'a pig is a pig' " but I must say it isn't a very good example.
to be sure, I haven't encountered situations in which a question was asked, to which someone replied 'it's natural.'
So, To clarify, saying that something is 'natural' or 'unnatural' isn't a valid response. And this is why no one uses it. At least, not that I've seen or heard.
- Anonymous1 decade ago
I think NW was headed in the right direction. The natural version is that form which is unaltered, or unadulterated. To say that a pig is a natural pig is to say that it is unaltered; unmanipulated; unaffected. Of course, this is a relative term, and one which depends heavily on perspective, sort of like the word far. I might say China is far, but a Chinese person would disagree. Canada is far from me as well, though not so far as China. Homosexuality is unnatural if we view Christian sexual morality as our base, unadulterated state, and see homosexuality as something Satan pushes people toward. But to someone who views whatever is happening in the animal kingdom as what is natural, when they learn of primates which engage in homosexuality, they conclude that it is natural. In terms of relative perspective, one with regular exposure to S&M might see homosexuality as very natural, compared to fetishizing pain.
In my opinion, by the way, arguing that any sort of Christian morality is natural is completely backward. The natural man is precisely that lesser part of us that we ought to be working to rise above as Christians. Morality is supposed to be unnatural. It is the very thing that sets us apart from the natural world. In the garden, natural is great. In human behavior, I prefer civil and moral.
- glenn123Lv 71 decade ago
I know...it sounds like it could mean just about anything. I think 'natural' basically describes an inherent characteristic that is indicative of that specific thing...or distinction.