Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

What if Muslims ruled the world?

Is this what life would be like?

Sakineh Mohammadie Ashtiani -- a mother of two -- could be stoned to death at any moment under the terms of a death sentence that Iranian authorities handed down in 2006.

Originally sentenced to 99 lashes for her alleged "illicit relationship outside of marriage," Ashtiani endured that corporal punishment in front of her then-17-year-old son in 2006. She was subsequently cleared of murder charges against her husband, but the judicial panel then re-examined Ashtiani's adultery sentence, and based on unspecified "judges' knowledge," bizarrely decided that she should be put to death by stoning for the alleged affair.

"At that time, it should have been finished. They should have punished her only once," said her son Sajjad, now 22. "Her documents say she is innocent. She already paid for the crime."

According to Amnesty International, the Iranian penal code specifies the procedures for death penalties and also specifies the types of rocks that should be used in stoning executions. Article 102 of the Iranian penal code states that "men will be buried up to their waists and women up to their breasts" for the purpose of execution by stoning.

Article 104 states, with reference to the penalty for adultery, that the stones used should "not be large enough to kill the person by one or two strikes; nor should they be so small that they could not be defined as stones." This makes it abundantly clear that the purpose of stoning is to inflict maximum pain in a process leading to slow death, which would be tantamount to "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment" under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/07/07/iftikhar.ira...

Update:

RJ - You too.

Update 2:

Carol - First sentence, the one with the question mark at the end.

Update 3:

Godless - the Inquisition was long ago. Iran is now. Your comparison is lame.

Update 4:

Mustache Pete - You ever been to Dearborn Michigan? It's like being in Persia.

20 Answers

Relevance
  • 1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    This and the flogging and hanging of a troubled 13 year old, the flogging of an elderly lady who spent time alone in the company of her grandson's friend after he got her bread when she was not allowed out to buy it, the stoning of many, the amputation of many, the flogging of many.

    The total covering of a young girls so their skin never feels the sun and wind, the female genital mutilation. My concerns about Islam are legion and I wish the it was so with the rest of the world.

  • ?
    Lv 7
    1 decade ago

    Don't ya' just love religion?

    Take a look at what true Christians (tm) did during the inquisitions.

    "Religion is an insult to human dignity. With or without it you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion."

    — Steven Weinberg, in "Freethought Today", April, 2000

    "I think enormous harm is done by religion — not just in the name of religion, but actually by religion. ... Many people do simply awful things out of sincere religious belief, not using religion as a cover the way that Saddam Hussein may have done, but really because they believe that this is what God wants them to do, going all the way back to Abraham being willing to sacrifice Isaac because God told him to do that. Putting God ahead of humanity is a terrible thing."

    — Steven Weinberg

    EDIT:

    Heartless noted, "the Inquisition was long ago. Iran is now. Your comparison is lame."

    OK. Let's look at Christianity recently:

    The Holocaust was based on ideas spread for hundreds of years by the Catholic and Protestant churches. Germany was a nation of Christians, and Hitler used Christianity as a reason for his actions.

    Five evangelical Christian leaders signed the "Land Letter" to George W Bush in 2002 affirming a Christian theological basis to invade Iraq.

    87% of all white evangelical Christians in the U.S. supported former President George W Bush's decision to go to war.

    80% of white evangelical Christian voters voted for George W Bush in 2004.

    Prohibition on fetal stem cell uses is almost totally based on Christian principles. This prevents or delays research that could help many (and perhaps most) people.

    Anti-science fervor is largely based on Christian or Muslim principles, depending on the dominant religion.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Isn't it ironic how over there, they'll do horrible things to innocent people, but over here, we're too sissy to do those sort of things to people that have raped and killed up to twenty people?

    Our world would be a much different place if they ruled the world, but with them or not, it's still going to **** because we're to sissy to say, "Enough, you raped a little girl, we'll give you twenty bullets in the leg and then let you bleed to death."

    They're to sick over there, and we're not sick enough. What country is in between? Oh, that's right, Australia. I'm moving there.

  • 1 decade ago

    If Muslims ruled the world,

    though it may be more moral,

    you would be so bored,

    that your head would feel like coral.

    In the days of Ceasar my friend

    we drank wine and beer

    and such joy would be no more

    if Muslims ruled here.

  • How do you think about the answers? You can sign in to vote the answer.
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    4. YOU shall NOT commit adultery, either physically, individually, or spiritually, nationally or individually but shall be FAITHFUL to God, your word and your spouse, also NOT committing adultery nationally by following the wrong examples of other nations.

    Mat5:17 Think not that I am come to destroy The Law, or the Prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill.

    5:18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no way pass from The Law, till all be fulfilled.

    5:19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least COMMANDments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the Kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach [them], the same shall be called great in the Kingdom of heaven.

    thew

    Source(s): http://jahtruth.net/comand.htm alleluJAH Malachi 4:5 Behold, I will send you EliJAH the Prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful Day of the "I AM" (Sura 43:61):
  • 1 decade ago

    My Western friends who've married Christian men from those countries have been regularly beaten and their children traumatized because that's the culture of loser nations. And people claim not to understand why the U.S. invaded Iraq!

  • 1 decade ago

    Not all muslims are radicals! Iran has some messed up laws because they are run by the radical ayatollah, but most muslims are tolerant and NORMAL people. Radicals like these are largely in the minority, just like radical christians are in the minority here in the western world.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    I have a rough idea what it would be like. I guess I'd be part of the rebel alliance.

  • 1 decade ago

    It wouldn't make any difference in what I believed. And anything after that is just window dressing.

  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago

    Why can't those weapons of mass destruction self-detonate?

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.