Who is a better source for information?

Neither. Independent journalists, economists and scientists are the most reliable. Radio and TV hosts just read the script provided by their corporate sponsors, and the leading universities have been co-opted by large corporations as well.

Definitely not Limbaugh, Hannity, and Beck. I would listen to professors and economist before I would listen to those in category A, unless they had views like Limbaugh, Hannity, and Beck, then we would have a problem.

I'm registered as a republican but rush, hannity, and beck are all too far right for me. For the most part i share the same beliefs as them but they all need to listen to others instead of being so stuck in thier own ways

B Professors and economist from leading Universities.

I will say b even though I have heard some pretty ridiculous professors at times.

Talk show hosts. At least they have run private businesses rather than spending their entire lives living on the public dole seeking government grants and writing exactly what the government wants them to in order to get the grants.

Fox is a propaganda machine and works for Zionists.

It has to be B for now depending on the Articles produced!

neither beck is an entertainer that libs are attracted to like a moron to a trainwreck

and the professors are ex hippies that stayed in college to avoid vietnam and are still pushing their pinko beliefs

There is DEFINITELY no bias at the University, no. I trust them COMPLETELY.

A is for entertainment

B is for learning

Go with the safe bet, A if one wants to be like most Americans.

........