Yahoo Answers is shutting down on May 4th, 2021 (Eastern Time) and beginning April 20th, 2021 (Eastern Time) the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

xD asked in Arts & HumanitiesPhilosophy · 1 decade ago

Problems with morals depending on religion or god.?

Im writing a paper for philosophy, and i need 3 problems with morals that depend on religion or god.

So far im going to talk about the famous question Socrates asks in the Euthyphro: "Is the pious being loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is being loved by the gods"

Then ill talk about how if morals depended on god, then god could flip a coin and choose whatever to be right or wrong.

And i just need a couple more points.

Thanks

3 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 decade ago
    Favorite Answer

    How about the obvious moral short comings of the Bible? The Old Testament especially the Book of Deuteronomy and the Book of Leviticus are especially vicious and call for death for what would be seen as minor trespasses these days. In fact, a long running moral failure joke with the Bible is that it got Slavery wrong (Leviticus 25:44-46 NLT).

  • 1 decade ago

    How about the question of gods morality? If god knows everything past, present and future then he knows what will happen before it happens and in turn lets immoral things happen. If god knows and has always known what you will do in the future before you were even born, then the future is already written. Why would god create these morals then intentionally create something that defies those morals, then later punish them for doing so?

    I'm not quite sure if that was the answer you were looking for but I'm intrigued by philosophy of religion and am not attacking anyones beliefs. Good luck with your philosophy paper.

  • Tagg R
    Lv 5
    1 decade ago

    Here's the most convincing argument:

    Religious morals can only be attained through divine revelation. Several people have claimed to witness such divine revelations, but most of them contradict each other. There is no rational method of discerning which of these people are lying and which are telling the truth. If god wanted people to abide by his morals, god would have made them perfectly clear.

    Bonus advice:

    That's what will help you with your paper, but considering Pascal's wager, I have come to think that it is more rational to pick your favorite religion and follow it's morals than to remain agnostic.

Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.